[Texas Eagle]

...and, richer too.

This may be splitting hares (hairs?), but wouldn't she be richer if she had stayed married.

Theoretically speaking, she would have retained access to 100% of Tiger's money as opposed to 50% or whatever percent she ended up with.

[Genoa]

Heh. Either way, it would be more than she could easily spend.

[mentor2k]

She just dissolved the corportation for a wholy owned one . . . no one to answer to.

[OldDeckHand]

"Theoretically speaking, she would have retained access to 100% of Tiger's money as opposed to 50% or whatever percent she ended up with."

Yes, that's theoretically possible. Of course, we have no idea what the actual financial dynamic was inside that home - Tiger has a reputation as a cheapskate, so we really have no clue what kind of "allowance" she was on, but I'm sure she probably didn't have want for anything.

There was a prenup, so even in his death, she may not have inherited all of it or even $100M. We'll never no for sure, unless one of them talks about it.

Lastly, the receipt of matrimonial assets in a divorce are not taxable. This is a common misconception. Whatever Elin received in the split, is hers to keep in it's entirety.

[Vendome]

Everyone would be miserable.

Cut bait and move on to another fishing hole.

[Psalm 144]

This may be splitting hares (hairs?), but wouldn’t she be richer if she had stayed married.

***************

Hairs.

I don’t think she ever intended to stay married to this cash tiger. The prenups look like a lease agreement, which it may have been.

[hoe_cake]

“but wouldn’t she be richer if she had stayed married.”

100 million? That’s quite enough, and she’s rid of that hound dog.

[RatRipper]

“splitting hares”

a good way to get the PETA goons after you

[Joe 6-pack]

"...but wouldn't she be richer if she had stayed married."

Depends on how you define "richer." Not everybody places a dollar sign on the quality of their life.