As much as I hate to say it, unless an order is directly against the Constitution, one has to follow it. Obama relies heavily on the input of advisers and the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
If Obama says “Do it,” and someone says “Yes sir,” then the order they pass down is legitimate, since that originating military officer is legitimate. That is where the trail begins, and where one must not question authority when the order in and of itself is reasonable and constitutional.
Whether Obama is ineligible or not, discipline must be maintained within the ranks of the military. Otherwise, you would have yahoos from here to eternity questioning every single thing they were told to do.
Article II, Section 2 of the United States Constitution provides the original source of command authority to the President as Commander-in-Chief.
“If Obama says “Do it,” and someone says “Yes sir,” then the order they pass down is legitimate, since that originating military officer is legitimate. That is where the trail begins, and where one must not question authority when the order in and of itself is reasonable and constitutional.”
I want off this merry-go-round now, I’m feeling motion sickness.
(if Obama gives orders that a sole decision maker, it comes from on,e and only one, authority. How can it be reasonable and Constitutional from an unreasonable and unConstitutional Usurper and cheif?