To: JewishRighter; conservativegramma
"
Maybe it’s just a dream, but, if it ever got as far as SCOTUS, there’s an obvious argument that the two juices, er uh, justices appointed by 0 would have to recuse themselves because the implication behind the case is that their appointments would be void as well. Since they have a direct, personal interest in the decision, they are ethically required to recuse. That would leave a ratio of 5:2 in favor of the conservatives or 4:2:1 if you consider Kennedy to be a wildcard.
Excellent deduction! However, would it even get heard to begin with? I've my doubts, based in history.
112 posted on
09/02/2010 1:02:56 PM PDT by
rxsid
(HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
To: rxsid
Excellent deduction! However, would it even get heard to begin with? I've my doubts, based in history. Which is why my post began "Maybe it's just a dream,..."
To: rxsid
>>>>
"That would leave a ratio of 5:2 in favor of the conservatives or 4:2:1 if you consider Kennedy to be a wildcard. Excellent deduction!" <<<<
That's the most positive comment I've heard in many months.
To: rxsid; JewishRighter
That would leave a ratio of 5:2 in favor of the conservatives or 4:2:1 if you consider Kennedy to be a wildcard. Excellent deduction! However, would it even get heard to begin with? I've my doubts, based in history.
I'm afraid I'm with rx on this one.....I too have my doubts that SCOTUS will ever commit to hearing this case.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson