Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Daisyjane69

LTC Lakin has standing here despite the naysayers and the usual trolls here who say otherwise.


60 posted on 09/02/2010 12:20:00 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: Red Steel

Red, I believe Lakin most definitely now has standing. But I also believe that having standing now means nothing. I say this because I also have zip, zero, NADA faith in SCOTUS.

There are now 2 infiltrator justices sitting on that court who have a PERSONAL interest in denying this case or any others. I don’t think standing will mean a thing.


67 posted on 09/02/2010 12:24:04 PM PDT by conservativegramma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

To: Red Steel
Memo to Freepers: Always assume a Birther is wrong about any legal matter they spout off about.

I'll concede Red Steel is 1/2 correct. LTC won't lose on grounds of standing.

Of course, LTC Lakin isn't the Plaintiff/Complainant in his own Court Martial. He is the Defendant. So "standing" won't be an issue. The issue he will lose his quixotic quest for discovery on is relevance. He is charged with missing a movement, said movement being ordered by his direct superior. That is what his Court Martial will be about. LTC Lakin will get discovery about matters related to his refusal to obey an order, but not about whether BO is President.

Flame away Birthers.

100 posted on 09/02/2010 12:48:35 PM PDT by Pilsner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson