Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: PA-RIVER
Hi, if you have the time, energy & inclination, can you explain further HOW this judge conferred legal STANDING to Terry Larkin? If what you state is accurate, this is not this reason to CELEBRATE??? TIA
68 posted on 09/02/2010 12:24:14 PM PDT by hennie pennie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: hennie pennie
In my humble opinion, if this is true, this judge has given standing to Lakin.

She is the conveneing authority in the court, and she is stateing that her court can not allow the opening of Obamas records because that might cause embarrassment to Congress, not solely because Mr. Lakin is not entitled to them. If so, then Mr. Lakin has been denied a fair trial from the start. Period.

Congress's embarrassment, in part or whole, is being weighed against a mans right to evidence in his trial, with his freedom hanging in the balance??? That, in my opinion is a travesty of justice.

This is blowing my mind. How this could not go to the supreme court is the big question. How will they avoid this?

This Judge may not be doing any thing wrong. In effect, What she did do, in my opinion, is tell the world that she can not serve justice for Mr. Lakin because the Congress is her master, and it is in their realm to provide justice in this particular case.

Mr. Lakin, in my opinion, now has injury and standing for a hearing in the Supreme court the moment he is convicted or punished in anyway.

105 posted on 09/02/2010 12:54:33 PM PDT by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson