Apparently for not following the courts directions after she was busted for reckelss driving and two seperate charges of driving under the influence and given lieniency in place of more significant penalties.
Who did she hurt, what did she destroy?
She might have been able to swerve around the kids in the mini-van the couple times that she was caught, but she was caught driving under the influence. Do you recommend no punishment for people driving under the influence or would it be better to only punish people once they kill a bus load of nuns and orphans?
She might have done the right thing in hiring legal counsel and committing to certain restrictions in her life in lieu of whatever the original punishment might have been. That was her choice.
As for not being able to live up to the restrictions she agreed to - tough shit for her. Time to pay for the original crime and to pay back the loan of leniency given to her.
What good does it do for me or you that she is incarcerated right now?
For that matter, what good does it do that you or I are not incarcerated right now?
I dont care if she snorts coke. Even if she was my next door neighbor. As long as she dosent bug me.
There are millions of vehicles and people out there, any combination of the two could hit and kill a bus full of orphans and nuns.
Why dont we ban all mind altering substances and ban driving.
Oh I forgot, they did that in Afghanistan, essentially.