Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/01/2010 5:25:21 AM PDT by Scythian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last
To: Scythian

Looks like he retired from Microsoft to become “god” ... ?


2 posted on 10/01/2010 5:26:59 AM PDT by Scythian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scythian

Bill,
You and your family first. Want to rethink that position?

Pan_Yan


3 posted on 10/01/2010 5:28:57 AM PDT by Pan_Yan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scythian

I give the liberals permission to stop reproducing at any time, you know....


4 posted on 10/01/2010 5:29:07 AM PDT by swatbuznik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scythian

Gates is prime evidence that intelligence in one area doesn’t necessarily translate into intelligence in other areas.


5 posted on 10/01/2010 5:31:20 AM PDT by Opinionated Blowhard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scythian

“Then he adds that in order to get CO2 to zero”

Let me see...zero CO2 means zero life on earth.
Bit extreme, don’tcha think, Bill?


6 posted on 10/01/2010 5:32:00 AM PDT by AlexW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scythian

As “smart” as these folks think they are, they just plain REFUSE to consider the unintended consequence of reducing atmospheric CO2.

REAL scientists have long demonstrated the direct, CAUSAL link between CO2 PPM and agricultural output and yields.

In other words if we DO manage to REDUCE atmospheric CO2, and reduce CO2 in the global biome, then worldwide, food supplies WILL suffer.

These “smart” people are still stuck on a false premise — that rising CO2 (anthropogenic or otherwise) is a BAD THING.

It just disgusts me that they are either willing participants in this fraud or are just really not that smart after all. I presume the former — they know this is a lie, and it’s really about elites lording over the masses. IOW it’s about money and power.


7 posted on 10/01/2010 5:32:47 AM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scythian

Isaiah 14:12 “How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!”


8 posted on 10/01/2010 5:33:30 AM PDT by vanilla swirl (We are the Patrick Henry we have been waiting for!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scythian

All progressives are for population control.
But even a man like Gates should be smart enough to know that without CO2 EVERYTHING dies on earth.

Crap, I barely got out of high school and know this!


9 posted on 10/01/2010 5:34:36 AM PDT by ozark hilljilly (Had enough, yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scythian

from the Georgia Guidestones;

Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.


11 posted on 10/01/2010 5:35:10 AM PDT by vanilla swirl (We are the Patrick Henry we have been waiting for!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scythian
I just came up with my own formula. It might not be necessary to wipe out humanity after all.

CO2 = (P x S x E x C)-(PLANTS x AMOUNT OF CO2 EATEN BY PLANTS)

Maybe instead of mass genocide, Bill Gates could plant a vegetable garden or something.
12 posted on 10/01/2010 5:36:53 AM PDT by Question Liberal Authority (Am I my half-brother's keeper?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scythian
... reproductive health services...
Translation = abortion
Whose "health" is being served when abortion is nothing more than birth/population control?
13 posted on 10/01/2010 5:36:58 AM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scythian
Bill Gates says vaccines can help reduce world population

Why go to all that trouble? Disease can do the same thing on its own. Medical care can be cheap, too: No care. Or, people can just not eat. That will reduce world population.

I think there's an a priori assumption here that reducing people is the point. As you say, start with the Gateses. The head of the household is a dangerous loon.

14 posted on 10/01/2010 5:36:58 AM PDT by SamuraiScot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scythian

Why do environmentalists want to live in the iceage? Think of all the increased sales in fur coats!


17 posted on 10/01/2010 5:41:31 AM PDT by facedodge (Nothing is so permanent as a temporary government program. ~Friedman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scythian

True capitalism and economic freedom will do the best job and ethically. The more prosperous a country becomes, the lower the birth rate. Look it up.


18 posted on 10/01/2010 5:42:03 AM PDT by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scythian
I know this will be unpopular here, but I agree that at the very least the population growth rate must come down. The world cannot handle exponential growth of the human race IMO. Flame away.
19 posted on 10/01/2010 5:42:27 AM PDT by Red in Blue PA (Planning on using 911? Google "Brittany Zimmerman")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scythian

>>> Bill Gates says vaccines can help reduce world population (Video)

I don’t have the spare bandwidth to watch this but if I was Bill and making the argument, I would be saying that improved healthcare would reduce the third world need for “spare” children. This then leading to a net decrease in total population.

If they were confident that two or three would survive to adulthood, they could follow the trend of the first world and have smaller families.


20 posted on 10/01/2010 5:42:56 AM PDT by tlb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scythian

Over-simplified headline. Seems to me he was aiming at the ‘healthy population has a lower birth-rate’ result, not that vaccines would kill off up to 10% of the people. Let’s keep at least one foot on the ground, people.


21 posted on 10/01/2010 5:43:39 AM PDT by NonValueAdded ("It's amazing, A man who has such large ears could be so tone deaf" Rush Limbaugh 9/8/10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scythian

Bill Gates’ ideas are completely asinine. Wouldn’t improving vaccines and health care lead to a higher population? I didn’t bother reading the article at the link. Furthermore, when he talks about “reproductive health services”, is he referring to killing unborn babies? I have no respect for the guy.


22 posted on 10/01/2010 5:45:16 AM PDT by ReluctantDragon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scythian

It seems to me that vaccines and health care would result in people’s living longer and producing more surviving offspring, resulting in a higher global population.

The “reproductive health” - sterilization and abortion - must be his real point. Death Eater Gates. Off yourself, first.


23 posted on 10/01/2010 5:45:36 AM PDT by Tax-chick (Beware of the owrk!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scythian
Looks to me like Bill should have stayed in college.

It's not much of a "vaccine" if it results in a population decrease.

25 posted on 10/01/2010 5:46:56 AM PDT by The Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson