Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: stripes1776
Could it be improved in the future by doing backups at the block-level rather than the file-level?

That's the article. Block-level would be great and let me use it to back up my VMWare virtual hard drives, which I exclude now because it would mean a 10-30 GB backup every time I started a VM. Messing with block-level is a great thing about ZFS and would allow this, but Apple's experiment with ZFS seems to have stalled for some reason.

19 posted on 10/04/2010 12:59:48 PM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: antiRepublicrat
Apple's experiment with ZFS seems to have stalled for some reason

I suspect that has something to do with Oracle now owning Sun Microsystems. ZFS has a specific type of open source license. If Oracle can sue someone over a small legal issue, they will.

At one time I had high hopes for ReiserFS, which is mentioned in the article. With Hans Reiser's unfortunate change in living quarters, I don't see any future now for it.

As far as I know Apple owns HFS+. They will probably extend it or develop something of their own.

20 posted on 10/04/2010 1:50:40 PM PDT by stripes1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson