Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: circlecity
Right. You "pardon" someone who has been convicted of a crime. The illegals have committed a crime, but have not been indicted or convicted, hence cannot be pardoned.

I'm sure he would if he could, but it would be a tremendous stretch.

6 posted on 10/12/2010 4:57:38 AM PDT by Former Proud Canadian (How do I change my screen name now that we have the most conservative government in the world?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Former Proud Canadian
"You "pardon" someone who has been convicted of a crime."

You don't have to be convicted. Gerald Ford pardoned Nixon for any crimes he "may" have committed even though Nixon had not been criminally convicted or even indicted. But, all Obama could do is pardon illegals for the criminal act of coming into the country illegally. That wouldn't make them citizens nor give them a right to be here. They would still be subject to deportation. Since no one is being prosecuted for such an offense such a "pardon" would be meaningless.

7 posted on 10/12/2010 5:03:04 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson