Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Huck
We had a lot of fun back in the day.
16 posted on 10/20/2010 9:10:49 AM PDT by publiusF27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: publiusF27
At a glance, he appears to be a comfortable Federalist. I, of course, don't mean that as a compliment. It's a pretty ironic term, actually. Deceptive branding, really:

"It had been insisted upon by those who were called anti-federalists, that this form of government consolidated the union; .... Those who were called anti-federalists at that time, complained that they were in favor of a federal government, and the others were in favor of a National one; the federalists were for ratifying the constitution as it stood, and the others did not until amendments were made [the Bill of Rights].Their names then ought not to have been distinguished by federalists and anti-federalists, but rats and anti-rats."

Elbridge Gerry


17 posted on 10/20/2010 9:16:44 AM PDT by Huck (Antifederalist BRUTUS should be required reading.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: publiusF27
In a way, robertpaulson is correct. The only difference between me and him is that he seems to celebrate the power of the Constitution, where I lament it. But I probably agree with his assessment of the Constitution.

That's a major stumbling block for people who dislike the national power. They believe that the Constitution is the solution, when in fact it's the problem. If you want limited government, anyway. If you like a big, honking, consolidated leviathan, then the Constitution is pretty good.

18 posted on 10/20/2010 9:19:20 AM PDT by Huck (Antifederalist BRUTUS should be required reading.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson