Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Proposed: U.S. Sovereignty - Amendment XXVIII
10/21/2010 | BocoLoco

Posted on 10/21/2010 4:32:56 AM PDT by BocoLoco

U.S. Sovereignty – Amendment XXVIII

  1. No person residing within the jurisdiction of the United States shall have an illegal citizenship status, nor obtain any support, funding, or benefits provided to citizens of the United States. No child of parents who are illegal residents shall be considered a citizen of the United States at birth.
  2. No citizen of the United States shall be a citizen of another nation. Citizens of the United States who are also citizens of one or more foreign nations must declare their allegiance to the United States on or before their 21st Birthday. Citizens who do not declare their allegiance forfeit their U.S. Citizenship status.
  3. The Congress shall declare an act of war against any nation having more than 50,000 foreign citizens residing illegally within the jurisdiction of the United States during a calendar year. The United States and the several States shall protect their borders against any invasion of illegal residents from any other state or foreign nation.
  4. English shall be the primary language of the United States, the several States, and its territories. All government branches of the United States shall perform business, legislature, elections, and communication using English.
  5. The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: amendments; congress; immigration; sovereignty
Let me know what your thoughts are on this. Keep the discussion real. We should propose this to our state and federal legislators when we're finished.
1 posted on 10/21/2010 4:33:00 AM PDT by BocoLoco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BocoLoco
English should be made our official language and all voting ballots, gov distributed info should be in English.

In 1790, 80% of the population was British and ENGLISH as our language was essentially inferred. It still is....The internet is a stunning example.

2 posted on 10/21/2010 4:50:48 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (What)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BocoLoco

In this and other posts you’ve been making an impressive debut to FR, congratulations.

Consider altering the wording in point 4 from: “communication using English” to

“communication using only the English language”

or

“communication using the English language as the primary language”

depending upon what is intended.

Also I recommend removing the breath comma after “elections”.


3 posted on 10/21/2010 5:01:02 AM PDT by agere_contra (...what if we won't eat the dog food?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BocoLoco

Can’t help but think that those horses already left the barn but, I totally agree.


4 posted on 10/21/2010 5:01:06 AM PDT by wolfcreek (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lsd7DGqVSIc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BocoLoco
No person residing within the jurisdiction of the United States shall have an illegal citizenship status, nor obtain any support, funding, or benefits provided to citizens of the United States.

Rewrite needed. As stated, you're barring people from having an illegal citizenship status. I don't think that's what you meant; I'd go with:

No person residing within the jurisdiction of the United States, whose presence is unlawful, shall obtain any support, funding, or benefits provided to citizens and legal residents of the United States.

I believe your intent was to make it so that illegal residents cannot receive any benefits from the US, rather than just restating their illegal status as being here illegally.

Additionally, I specifically added the qualifier "and legal residents" since they are - IMHO rightly so - afforded some benefits given to citizens. Those here legally are not the problem, and we should extend graces as needed, as most of them are either here as tourists (in which case, common courtesy should extend medical/emergency/disaster care), legal immigrants/green card holders usually working towards citizenship, or at least paying their fair share and participating in society in a positive manner.

5 posted on 10/21/2010 5:23:58 AM PDT by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the Sting of Truth is the defense of the indefensible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BocoLoco

I think if a more better amendment on sovereignty would prohibit the signing of global govenment and global bureaucratic treaties. That is the the real threat to sovereignty.

I don’t think we need to go to war against Mexico, Haiti, Cuba, Guatamala, Honduras, etc. As the 0bama daughter said, just plug the damn hole.


6 posted on 10/21/2010 6:20:40 AM PDT by wolfman23601
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra

“In this and other posts you’ve been making an impressive debut to FR, congratulations.”

Much obliged.

Thanks to all so far who have contributed. Keep the good feedback coming and I will periodically amend the proposal.

I feel this is an excellent exercise to show the ridiculous excuse for a governing body we call Congress just how simple this process really is.


7 posted on 10/21/2010 9:01:46 AM PDT by BocoLoco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BocoLoco

Proposed concurrent legislation:

1. Illegal aliens are to be detained upon detection and deported within twenty-four hours.

2. Any citizen knowingly employing, sheltering, concealing, or otherwise assisting (other than emergency medical care) an illegal alien shall suffer forfeiture of all property, real and personal, all assets, businesses, business licenses, and any other thing except his/her physical freedom and two changes of clothing; after which he/she may seek employment and start over.

3. Any non-citizen legally resident, acting as described in para 2 above, shall suffer the same penalty and be deported to his/her country of origin within 48 hours.

4. Any public official, in any branch of government, at any level, who under color of clemency, legal discretion, or other official privilege, shall obstruct, alter, or modify the swift application and extent of paras 1-3 above to any degree soever, shall suffer the same penalty and be summarily removed from office.

(That’s to keep judges from saying “ooooo, that’s too harsh” and governors etc. from handing out pardons to business-owner buddies.)


8 posted on 10/21/2010 10:04:53 AM PDT by ExGeeEye (Spread the work ethic; the wealth will follow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson