Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ransomnote

“There are costs involved in treating those who are maimed, burying those who are killed etc.”

True, but those are private costs, and not public costs that must be paid by the taxpayers.

“A young friend of mine said his pitbull pulled up or apart any fence he built so he had to give up and let the dog roam the property.”

That’s a perfect example of a person who doesn’t take the responsibility for properly training the animal with the seriousness that it demands. Plenty of pit bulls don’t engage in the behavior of pulling apart fences, so the behavior in this instance is obviously a result of lax training.

“If only motorcyclists must have, and pay for, a motorcycle license, then only those who own animals that require regulation should pay for that regulation.”

I don’t believe in the need for motorcycle licenses, so that argument for regulation isn’t winning me over.

Now, I see your point about the general population suffering the consequences of irresponsible pit bull owners, but the same could be said of the general population suffering the consequences of irresponsible firearm owners. Does that mean we should require registration and regulation of all firearms, making it purposefully burdensome to possess them, in order to lessen the amount of firearms in the hands of irresponsible people? Well, plenty of governments have tried that approach, and I think we all know how that has turned out. The irresponsible will still be irresponsible, and only the responsible will comply, while the general population still suffers the consequences of the irresponsible people. The better approach is to punish the irresponsible people harshly, to deter the behavior by making an example of them to others who would be irresponsible. This approach serves to lessen the burden on both the general population and the responsible citizens. It’s a win-win!


54 posted on 10/23/2010 4:05:46 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: Boogieman

I dont’ think punishing irresponsible owners is working - people are still being killed or maimed (isn’t that deterrent enough?) and the pitbull owners still don’t care and offer no alternatives.


55 posted on 10/23/2010 4:25:25 PM PDT by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

To: Boogieman; ransomnote
True, but those are private costs, and not public costs that must be paid by the taxpayers.

Really? You're not familar with the Victim/Witness program (funded through taxpayer dollars) which provides medical treatment, counseling services, and other services to the victims of crime or other violent incidents, are you? Yes, people who are attacked by a vicious dog can utilize this program.

79 posted on 10/28/2010 11:58:27 AM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud Papa of two new Army Brats! Congrats to my Soldier son and his wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson