Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

1% Tax on ALL Financial Transactions
Congressional Record | Oct. 30, 2010

Posted on 10/30/2010 10:28:10 AM PDT by econjack

This topic was posted here once before, but only 10 people commented on it! I can't believe that, since this tax applies to EVERY deposit you make to any financial account. And, it works on money going out of the account, too. So if you write a check to your child in college, you get charged 1% of the amount. Your child, when they deposit the check also gets charged 1%. Only 10 of you find that a bad idea! Come on...this should cause rioting in the streets!

The bill is HR-4646 introduced by US Rep Peter DeFazio D-Oregon and US Senator Tom Harkin D-Iowa. It is now in committee and will probably not be brought out until after the Nov. elections.

President Obama's finance team is recommending a transaction tax. His plan is to sneak it in after the November election to keep it under the radar. This is a 1% tax on all transactions at any financial institution i. e. Banks, Credit Unions, etc.. Any deposit you make, or move around within your account, i. e. transfer to, will have a 1% tax charged. If your pay check or your social Security or whatever is direct deposit, 1% tax charged. If you hand carry a check in to deposit, 1% tax charged, If you take cash in to deposit, 1% tax charged. This is from the man who promised that if you make under $250,000 per year, you will not see one penny of new tax. Keep your eyes and ears open, you will be amazed at what you learn.

Some will say: Aw, it's just 1%... remember once the tax is there they can raise it at will.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: balancedbudget; hr4646; taxes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last
To: Hoodat; SAJ

Apologies for the doubled post (sigh...).


41 posted on 10/30/2010 11:53:37 AM PDT by SAJ (Zerobama -- a phony and a prick, therefore a dildo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: econjack

My husband is having hissy fits about this.. We need to think..what is 1% of your pay check automatic deposit? How about the checks you write ?

Will the banks raise fees to cover the “extra” work?

Lets hope it dies a quick death


42 posted on 10/30/2010 11:57:10 AM PDT by RnMomof7 (Some call me harpy..God calls me His)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7

This Rake is Rape.


43 posted on 10/30/2010 12:08:05 PM PDT by Surrounded_too (Robot machine guns and the Dirty Dozen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
You would be punished for putting your money in the bank, so you'd stuff it in your mattress instead.

Stuffing a paycheck into a mattress doesn't help much. You have to cash the thing. After that, though, you can operate on a cash basis.

You can't buy things on the Internet on a cash basis. That would put quite a crimp in my buying.

44 posted on 10/30/2010 12:17:38 PM PDT by JoeFromSidney ( New book, RESISTANCE TO TYRANNY. More @ www.book-resistancetotyranny.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: The Truth Will Make You Free

Peter: “That virus you’re always talking about, right? The one that could, uh, rip off the company for a bunch of money.”
Michael: “Yeah, what about it?”
Peter: “Well, how does it work?”
Michael: “It’s pretty brilliant. What it does is, every time there’s a bank transaction where interest is competed, you know, thousands a day, the computer ends up with these fractions of acent, which it usually rounds off. What this does is, it takes those little remainders and puts it into an account.”
Peter: “This sounds familiar.”
Michael: “Yeah, they did it in Superman III.”
Peter: “Right.”
Michael: “Yeah. Underrated movie, actually. And then there were a bunch of hackers, did it in the ‘70s as well. One of them got busted.”
Peter: “Well, so they check for this now.”
Michael: “No, here’s the thing. Initech’s so backed up with all the software we’re updating for the year 2000, they’d never notice.”
Peter: “You’re right. And even if they wanted to, they couldn’t check all that code.”


45 posted on 10/30/2010 12:22:21 PM PDT by dfwgator (Texas Rangers - Oh well it was a nice season.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: econjack
This topic was posted here once before, but only 10 people commented on it!

It was too stupid to comment on.

It's also too stupid to get more than 10 votes in Congress.

46 posted on 10/30/2010 12:33:30 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: econjack

These posts never have links to the proposed legislation.

Ever wonder why not?


47 posted on 10/30/2010 12:45:11 PM PDT by Atlas Sneezed ("Nobody tell Barack Obama what number comes after a trillion" --S.P.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: econjack
Hairbrained schemes like this are making me seriously consider offshoring any funds I currently have in US banking facilities, whether it passes or not.

Call it a loss of confidence in our government.

48 posted on 10/30/2010 12:50:43 PM PDT by Sarajevo (You're jealous because the voices only talk to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: econjack
Add to this the provisions in ZERO-care (AKA o-bummerCare) that allow gov’t access to all bank accounts and adds 1600 new IRS agents to enforce the new health laws and it seems plain enough. He is sticking it to the middle class on purpose, because to him and his "czars", we are as he recently put it, "the enemy".

The attack on America from within continues!

49 posted on 10/30/2010 1:03:12 PM PDT by Spitzensparkin1 (Arrest and deport all illegal aliens. Illegal is not a race - it is a crime. WhooRaah! Arizona!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba

All you have to do is Google HR-4646.


50 posted on 10/30/2010 2:16:40 PM PDT by econjack (Some people are as dumb as soup.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

I hope you’re right...but what if you’re not? It’s an ounce-pound thingie...


51 posted on 10/30/2010 2:18:16 PM PDT by econjack (Some people are as dumb as soup.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: econjack
I hope you’re right...but what if you’re not?

After the thrashing they're about to receive, the Dems will try to avoid overtly stupid legislation, at least for a little while.

52 posted on 10/30/2010 3:37:04 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: econjack

http://www.snopes.com/politics/taxes/debtfree.asp


53 posted on 10/31/2010 7:45:03 AM PDT by Atlas Sneezed ("Nobody tell Barack Obama what number comes after a trillion" --S.P.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: econjack; abcraghead; aimhigh; Archie Bunker on steroids; bicycle thug; blackie; coffeebreak; ...
**US Rep Peter DeFazio D-Oregon**

View Image
 
OREGON PING!
 
If you aren't on this ping list and are interested
in articles about Oregon, please FReepmail me.

54 posted on 10/31/2010 8:55:38 AM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1_Rain_Drop

“correct me if I’m wrong. I thought that Oregon has no taxes”

LOL LOL LOL

Now crying, realty back.


55 posted on 10/31/2010 9:16:49 AM PDT by Cold Heart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Cold Heart
oh great :(
now I'm crying
56 posted on 10/31/2010 9:34:29 AM PDT by 1_Rain_Drop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: econjack
All you have to do is Google HR-4646.

When I did, I discovered that Defazio is NOT the one who introduced this.

P.S. I want him to lose to Robinson, anyway.

57 posted on 10/31/2010 1:51:09 PM PDT by newberger (Put not your trust in princes, in sons of men in whom there is no salvation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: kingu

I rather agree.


58 posted on 10/31/2010 10:04:01 PM PDT by El Sordo (The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: IncPen

ping
So I am required to use direct deposit for paycheck, my income is already taxed, govt going to tax me again to get the money, then again when I spend. This on top of sales what a bunch of aholes


59 posted on 10/23/2011 2:57:49 PM PDT by Nailbiter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: econjack

I just heard about it this week, and I’m boiling mad. With all these fees, it could conceivably wipe out my retirement check. Leave it to the liberals to have their hands in your pocketbook!


60 posted on 01/07/2012 12:30:53 PM PST by tob2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson