Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: casuist

My first speculation is that it is maybe in foreclosure and the former owner just abandoned the place and the bank wasn’t privvy to the information.


8 posted on 11/10/2010 11:51:06 AM PST by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: tiki

It could have been a feed lot. Someone was being paid to keep and feed them. But he took the money and ran and the owner had not felt a need to check on them.


10 posted on 11/10/2010 11:53:25 AM PST by Terry Mross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: tiki

That would make perfect sense I suppose. Your investment is underwater, so you walk away as so many former homeowners were forced to do, only in this case a part of that investment lives, breathes, and suffers miserably alone, in tiny pens, with no food, no water, no care whatsoever, and probably in the dark.


13 posted on 11/10/2010 11:55:45 AM PST by casuist (Audi alteram partem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: tiki

once a farm goes into foreclosure, its a legal matter. My son was foreclosed on and the sheriff was involved to serving the papers and the bank checked frequently to make sure the house was not destroyed as long as they were still living in it...over 4 acres in my state gives you a couple of years to live in the house before the owner can be evicted..


56 posted on 11/10/2010 12:42:51 PM PST by goat granny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson