Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: CharlesWayneCT

The posted video shows plume movement and a flame. You and I had this discussion earlier today: I see it, you see something else.

No matter, FReepers can look at the video and make up their own minds.

On the second point: if this was a booster cook-off or some other misfire then the filing requirements go out of the window. It would also explain why the Navy aren’t claiming it as one of theirs. Seems plausible.


54 posted on 11/12/2010 5:22:41 PM PST by agere_contra (...what if we won't eat the dog food?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: agere_contra

Ok, bedtime. Good night from this side of the pond.


55 posted on 11/12/2010 5:23:54 PM PST by agere_contra (...what if we won't eat the dog food?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

To: agere_contra
It would also explain why the Navy aren’t claiming it as one of theirs.

As would it not being a rocket.

59 posted on 11/12/2010 5:35:05 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson