Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

I'm liking this guy more and more.
1 posted on 11/17/2010 4:49:06 AM PST by workerbee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: workerbee

I understand it, but I don’t know. Hopefully it has more symbolism for him than just that miserable marriage his parents were stuck in.


2 posted on 11/17/2010 5:08:34 AM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: workerbee

Shouldn’t this be titled

“Rich effeminate prince gives expensive ring that was paid for by British Commoners to millionaire fiance.”?


3 posted on 11/17/2010 5:10:12 AM PST by macquire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: workerbee

I’ve always been somewhat amazed by the lack of spirituality of both Charles and Diana.

Charles is out sampling the cafeteria of religious experiences and seemed to have no concept of real Christianity (despite being raised to be “The Defender of the Faith!”, and Diana seemed to be a functional agnostic (despite reports she was looking into Islam). They were a troubled couple. Both seemed to have new age “greeny” tendencies.

Perhaps losing his Mom brought William to a deeper place. I hope so.

It’s nice to see the tradition, and I hope they have a happy and blessed marraige.


4 posted on 11/17/2010 5:11:11 AM PST by I still care (I miss my friends, bagels, and the NYC skyline - but not the taxes. I love the South.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: workerbee

OK, they’re a nice couple.

Now get ready for non-stop royal marriage coverage.

The royal family doesn’t have much of a record for successful marriages.

Let’s hope that these two do better.


5 posted on 11/17/2010 5:17:30 AM PST by RexBeach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: workerbee

Where’s the picture of the ring? Or failing that the picture of Kate in a bikini (OK so I’m living vicariously here)


6 posted on 11/17/2010 5:18:11 AM PST by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: workerbee

You know how there are famous diamonds are cursed, let us hope this is not the case here. I would like to see William as the king, not Charles.


9 posted on 11/17/2010 5:47:39 AM PST by swatbuznik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: workerbee

Cheapskate.


20 posted on 11/17/2010 7:21:53 AM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: workerbee

Who in her Right mind would waste her time on this effeminate fop were he not representative of the obscenity of “royal” birth? Only a woman patterned — as she has stated herself to be — on the effeminate fop’s similarly cynically opportunistic and subsequently serially promiscuous trollop female parent, Mz Dianna Spencer.


32 posted on 11/20/2010 11:02:42 PM PST by Brian Allen (Buraq Hussayn bin Buraq Hussayn bin Hussayn Ubambi, is to America what Pol Pot was to Cambodia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson