Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Verginius Rufus

I consider that to be physiology, not so much anthropology.

It’s like a botanist knowing how plants relate to one another.

Outside of the physiology there’s not much of a factual basis, that I can see in anthropology, and a whole heap load of conjecture.

You can get that with History as well. Empirical history is only part of the overall discipline.


27 posted on 12/09/2010 9:35:19 PM PST by BenKenobi (Obama's book of the month, Herman Melville's Killin' Whitey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: BenKenobi

ok, so genetics isn’t science? nor is forensics? By finding a penny with the date of 1900 in an undisturbed site makes a pretty clear case that that penny was not dropped before 1900, giving a reference for human activity timeline. Now saying that that penny was used for religious purposes would be beyond conjecture unless it was at the bottom of a known religious shrine etc.


32 posted on 12/10/2010 11:11:51 AM PST by Docbarleypop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson