To: Old Teufel Hunden
You are correct but what the other poster fails to point out is that should the agreed upon rules be violated, there are reprocussions that may be enacted. This is one of those instances.
It won’t be relitigated, there is an option under parlamentary rules that may suffice here. I don’t know the specifics but after discussing this with Congresspersons and staffers, it appears to be a viable solution.
I’m working on this now and it may take some time. But we have grounds.
19 posted on
01/25/2011 10:35:50 AM PST by
BCR #226
(07/02 SOT www.extremefirepower.com...The BS stops when the hammer drops.)
To: BCR #226; Old Teufel Hunden; Yo-Yo
But we have grounds. I'm not sure you do - see Yo-Yo's #6 and my #21. We could be wrong, but I don't think so.
22 posted on
01/25/2011 10:50:33 AM PST by
brityank
(The more I learn about the Constitution, the more I realise this Government is UNconstitutional !!)
To: BCR #226
"I’m working on this now and it may take some time. But we have grounds."
So this could be overturned without a law being enacted? That would be awesome. As for people who have been hurt by this law, I don't think there will be any recourse for them, will there? That would be the tough part. If this happens, in celebration I will buy myself a fully auto AR-15. Just hope my gun club allows me to shoot it. As of right now, no weapons are allowed to be fired on fully auto. I've always suspected it was because they didn't want to deal with the hassle of having to make sure everyone who did it had a legal fully auto rifle...
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson