Posted on 01/31/2011 8:21:41 AM PST by Immerito
A dog that unexpectedly breaks free of its release is an example of a lack of foresight; a problem that merits a warning or a fine. Letting a dog wander the streets freely is owner irresponsibility.
While chaining a dog is not the best method of containing a dog, it is better than allowing said dog to wander loose around the neighborhood.
I’ll take your silence as an indication that you are perfectly willing to suggest that Freepers who, for whatever reason, do not have fenced property, should not own dogs and are negligent dog owners based on that fact alone.
I’m never silent, LOL. Nothing you say changes the truth:
The dogs got loose ergo the owner acted irresponsibly.
It is cruel to chain a dog.
*
“Obviously, every call for assistance doesn’t end up badly, but enough of them do that it pays one to be ready to deal with all sorts of unexpected and unintended consequences.”
Classic description of what too often happens when 911 is called for a disturbed person not taking their meds. Cops arrive and give disturbed person orders which he/she is not capable or willing to follow. Cops end up shooting disturbed person in “self defense.”
You have stated two opinions, not the truth.
Dogs permitted by the owner to run loose? Owner negligence and irresponsibility.
Dogs that get out upon provocation on one occasion? Not sufficient evidence of an irresponsible owner.
It’s crueler to deliberately allow a dog to run loose, risking that either it or a citizen will be injured or killed.
I find it ironic that you are more upset about a chained dog than a dead dog.
Pretty soom you’ll blame me for those poor dead dogs.
No need for hyperbole. :-)
Regards,
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.