Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: central_va
"Before you go, will you give me a Yes or No to my question? Would that situation be acceptable? Again a simple yes or no."

Wouldn't it be quicker to ask me if I still beat my wife?

Of course it's not acceptable that children be exposed at any age to liquor or prostitutes. Ideally, no one would ever even be affected, negatively or otherwise, by "demon rum" or "loose women." However, what is even less acceptable is the idea that it's a good idea for government that is somehow powerful enough to prevent immorality and so powerful as to even prevent the bare exposure of anyone to the same, which you obviously think is a role for government. Given the proclivities of those in power to eventually define immorality, i.e., evil, as "against our way of thinking," this notion that government should not be limited immensely empowers the liberals to do exactly what they are doing, which is to expand the government to enforce 'civil rights,' i.e., homosexual rights and politically correct thought. So while to your mind there is a simple answer this question, you obviously don't understand the implications of a "no" or a "yes," standing alone.

Hence my earlier response, which you obviously care not to read. I can only assume that thinking and rational, reasonable discussion about conservative political ideology and tactics aren't at all what you have in mind when you come here. Thus, again, there is little point in replying to your posts here. Good day to you, sir or ma'am, and good luck with your liberal outlook on the size of government. I hope it does not some day come back to haunt you.

127 posted on 02/12/2011 5:28:05 PM PST by LibertarianInExile (When Republicans don't vote conservative, conservatives don't vote Republican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]


To: LibertarianInExile

see many libertarians have no problem with a crack house and whore house right next to a kid school or have a problem with a woman marrying her dog.

Yes they have said that on here so that to me is why I am against libertarians for the most part

itn all sounds good doesn;t it, keep Govt out of marriage, out of lives etc but when given questions like crack house next to a day care then most libertarians do not want to answer as they know it needs Govt to make a law to stop that and yet if they say no problem then they are classed as a nut , about marriage they are IMHO


131 posted on 02/12/2011 5:48:02 PM PST by manc (Shame on all who voted for the repeal of DADT, who supported it or never tried to stop it. Traitors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson