[jamese777]

Would you be so kind as to cite your references on this statement? Or is this your personal opinion?

---

Ankeny et. al. v The Governor of Indiana. Mitch Daniels
http://caselaw.findlaw.com/in-court-of-appeals/1501011.html
(Scroll to Section B of the Court’s opinion: “Natural Born Citizen”

[devattel]

jamese777 said:

Ankeny et. al. v The Governor of Indiana. Mitch Daniels http://caselaw.findlaw.com/in-court-of-appeals/1501011.html (Scroll to Section B of the Court’s opinion: “Natural Born Citizen”

Thank you for the citation. Unfortunately we will never know what the Supreme Court would have said as the plaintiffs never appealed it to the Supreme Court. One would think all citizens would like to hear what the Supreme Court has to say on this matter with regards to presidential requirements.

Nevertheless we know where the courts stand with regards to this issue. The final battleground will be between one or more states and the federal government. Will we ever get a definitive decision on this, one that isn't based on the faulty premise of the 14th Amendment rewriting Article II definitions?