Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: jamese777; Mr Rogers

The Supreme Court has told us a natural born citizen is a child born in the country to citizen parents.

The Supreme Court has never told us a natural born citizen is born to one or two alien parents.

The Supreme Court has told us the Law of Nations is law in this country since the Founding.

The Law of Nations tells us a natural born citizen is born to citizen parents.

A Founder told us the Law of Nations is Divine Law.

A Founder has told us the Law of Nations is municipal law.

The First President of the United States told us to prosecute all crimes against the Law of Nations.

The Law of Nations is written in the Constitution.

Why do you two continue to deny these facts.


189 posted on 02/15/2011 9:02:27 PM PST by bushpilot1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies ]


To: bushpilot1

Because the Law of Nations, as you well know, does NOT refer to a book. And the Supreme Court HAS argued that the meaning of NBC is rooted in the common law term NBS, which it then pointed out DOES allow for TWO alien parents. And as you know, the dissent argued that the interpretation they adopted meant the child of a tourist could become President.

Those are facts your side refuses to recognize.


197 posted on 02/16/2011 6:40:23 AM PST by Mr Rogers (Poor history is better than good fiction, and anything with lots of horses is better still)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson