Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ronnyquest

Thank my luck stars, that someone knows their history. And thank you for bringing up many relevent facts to Lincoln to the thread. Sadly, I find that the Lincoln lovers have only a remedial public education, understanding of who Lincoln was. It took many years after getting out of school, and learning actually history to understand the man more. He was no “do gooder,” and it’s funny, because many of the books praising him, refer to all the “good he did” despite the “adverse background.” It’s so miraculous, because it’s fabricated. Our history has been white washed by the same likes of public educators who purchase textbooks from Iran claiming there was no Holocaust.

The reason I’m participating in this thread (and glad you have), is because I learned much more and had a better starting point to learn from, after hearing people make claims about Lincoln that I didn’t believe. I had previously known that he did not fight the war for slaves, for example, because my mother is a history buff. However, I didn’t learn of his dictatorial tyranny until many years later, and starting to read books about the man and who he was. A warped man from a broken home, who wanted supreme power, much like our current occupier, who married an eventual (if not before) devil worship practicioner. At least now they just worship environmentalism, not like the olden days.


23 posted on 02/21/2011 1:52:24 PM PST by JDW11235 (I think I got it now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: JDW11235; ronnyquest
And thank you for bringing up many relevent facts to Lincoln to the thread.

Can one of you please help me with one of the facts that was listed? I'm looking for a list of those 300 newspapers that Lincoln personally shut down. Can one of you point me to it?

33 posted on 02/21/2011 2:34:36 PM PST by K-Stater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: JDW11235

Thank you for your praise and I am glad that you have educated yourself beyond the fairy tales people have spread since the Reconstruction.

I’m glad that you brought up the fact that Lincoln did not go to war for slaves. That point is much-argued and I have been “virtually” slapped even on this board for suggesting such a thing. I will further add that he freed the slaves not as a measure of “do-goodery,” but in order to foment an insurrection in the Confederate states, forcing them to fight on two fronts.


34 posted on 02/21/2011 2:35:28 PM PST by ronnyquest (Barack H. Obama is the Manchurian Candidate. What are you going to do about it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: JDW11235

You bitch and moan about Lincoln, “OMG, Lincoln was such a tyrant”, but there is no criticism of the “nation” that was founded with slavery at it’s core. Habeas corpus was suspended during wartime, vs. people being enslaved for a lifetime, doesn’t exactly match up.


70 posted on 02/21/2011 5:52:35 PM PST by WinOne4TheGipper ("Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them." Ronald Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson