[sarah palin rocks]

I am not a fanatic. I support Sarah because she stands for the issues I believe in. I approved of the way she governed Alaska. I’ve followed her record and achievments which are impressive to me. She is not perfect and has her flaws.

The other 2012 candidates have their positives and minuses also.

I fully understand what Christie meant but Drudge and the Media want to generate headlines. I follow politics and know the lay of the land more or less.

There is a growing number of voices in the GOP who would like to draft Christie to run for 2012. If you follow politics, you will know he is very popular these days. Who knows? He may throw his hat in the ring later if he gets enough support - the race is wide open now.

I’m late. Gotta run now.

[r9etb]

I fully understand what Christie meant but Drudge and the Media want to generate headlines.

And you passed on the headline as if that were the whole thing.... does that make you part of the problem?

I don't think Christie will run. Though he's no doubt flattered and tempted by the attention.

Barbour ... probably not -- he's a canny enough pol to see how the cards will fall with regard to alleged racial issues in the past.

I think Daniels will run, though.

[wtc911]

I approved of the way she governed Alaska

_________________________________________

Oh, you like windfall profit taxes that drove business out and giving $50 million to a company to study a project that hasn't and likely never will get off the ground? And, of course you approve of the 'getting hot in this kitchen - I'm out' half-term, don't you?