Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Little Pharma
Jeffferson Davis ,President of the Confederacy was anti-slavary and the southern congress was already holding hearing on the abloishment of slavary when Lincoln attacked. Davis owned no slaves(adopted a young black man as his son). Neither did General Lee and the rest of the Confederate Generals whereas almost all of the Northern Generals owned slaves. Lincoln was a slave owner. Liberal historians try hide this by saying that the slaves were his wife's not his..
57 posted on 03/20/2011 8:40:33 AM PDT by omegadawn (qualified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: omegadawn

A LITTLE knowledge is a scary thing, and you have somewhat less than a little. Where do you get this crap?

Among the other false statements you made, I don’t think there’s any credible source that documents Lincoln EVER owning slaves.


59 posted on 03/20/2011 8:47:19 AM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

To: omegadawn
Jeffferson Davis ,President of the Confederacy was anti-slavary and the southern congress was already holding hearing on the abloishment of slavary when Lincoln attacked. Davis owned no slaves(adopted a young black man as his son). Neither did General Lee and the rest of the Confederate Generals whereas almost all of the Northern Generals owned slaves. Lincoln was a slave owner. Liberal historians try hide this by saying that the slaves were his wife's not his..

Incredible. There was not a single accurate statement in that entire paragraph. Usually you all manage to have at least one, even by accident. I think that qualifies you for entry in the League of the South Hall of Fame.

75 posted on 03/20/2011 9:43:58 AM PDT by K-Stater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

To: omegadawn
Jeffferson Davis ,President of the Confederacy was anti-slavary

False, he owned more than 100.

and the southern congress was already holding hearing on the abloishment of slavary when Lincoln attacked.

Not that I'm aware of. Understandably, they had other things on their minds.

Davis owned no slaves(adopted a young black man as his son).

There is no documentation Davis ever adopted Jim Limber. Seems to not have spent much thought on him after the war. More likely he was brought into the family as a playmate for their son of the same age, much as one might "adopt" a puppy.

Neither did General Lee and the rest of the Confederate Generals

Lee may not have owned slaves but did administer an estate with many. Wade Hampton, for one example, owned the most slaves in SC and possibly in the entire country.

whereas almost all of the Northern Generals owned slaves.

Would appreciate a statistical analysis to support such an idiotic statement.

Lincoln was a slave owner. Liberal historians try hide this by saying that the slaves were his wife's not his..

Various members of Mary's family owned numbers of slaves. Some of these may at times have been assigned to work for Mary on a temporary basis. I know of no evidence she, or certainly Lincoln, ever held title to slaves.

127 posted on 03/20/2011 2:17:30 PM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson