Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BenLurkin

It’s pretty obvious that any Photoshopping being done here is to take Obama OUT of the picture. His blue pant leg is still clearly visible between his grandparents. It drops below the level of the bench. Likewise, note the semi-circular marking on the left side of the tree at the 2:00 position on Madelyn’s head. That’s where Obama’s head was excised out of the original photo.

It’s disturbing to me that Cashill buys into this bogus Photoshop claim. It makes me wonder where else he has been fast and loose with the facts.


15 posted on 04/08/2011 8:48:23 AM PDT by DrC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DrC
I think you re right - the photo without Obama looks photoshopped. Study the patterns of the stone in the lower right hand section of the photo. Too many identical patterns.

Look at the bush / small tree on the right hand side of the second photo. Look at where the wall meets the brush - four identical patterns right next to each other. Photoshopped.

36 posted on 04/08/2011 8:56:58 AM PDT by warsaw44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: DrC
It’s disturbing to me that Cashill buys into this bogus Photoshop claim. It makes me wonder where else he has been fast and loose with the facts.

Yes it is very unfortunate. It makes it easy for the left to dismiss ALL of the questions when we seize upon something that appears to be a fake. :-(

38 posted on 04/08/2011 8:58:19 AM PDT by jtal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: DrC
YES!, The second photo with just granny and grandpop is photoshopped! ( Is a “duh” needed here?)

The **POINT** of photoshopping granny and grandpop together is to show the how natural this would have been in the original photo

The **POINT** of the granny and grandpop photo is to show that the one with Obama in it is **SELF-EVIDENTLY** UNNATURAL.

Now, if you fail to get this after it has been explained then I will get out the troll spray.

39 posted on 04/08/2011 8:58:28 AM PDT by wintertime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: DrC
I agree with your assessment. The photo with Barry is the original but the disembodied hand of granddad was added. Possibly bait for us to chase and look like fools?

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
52 posted on 04/08/2011 9:05:30 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: DrC

Wrong.

The “knee” is completely different in the two photos - shading, color weight, and indentation on the man’s leg. Likewise, there is no “semicircular marking” on the tree, other than a barely discernable jog in the tree trunk which is roughly 1/10th the size of Obama’s head.

For Grampa’s hand to be on Obama’s shoulder, his forearm would have to be well over twice as long as his upper arm to place his hand in the position in the photo.

Look at the shading - both grandparents have sunlight/shadow on their shoulders, torso front, and knees, indicating a source of illumination (the sun) was almost directly overhead. Obama shows no such illumination (even though his knees are in the same position), save for a slight reflection on his right shoulder and forearm... indicating that the source of the illumination in his photoshopped image was low and to his right.


58 posted on 04/08/2011 9:09:01 AM PDT by snowrip (Liberal? You are a socialist idiot with no rational argument.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: DrC

Your wrong. As circlecity pointed out Gramps shoulder, upper arm, and hand are not in the correct position. That is obviously a doctored photo.


71 posted on 04/08/2011 9:23:21 AM PDT by MCF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: DrC

I also find it most disturbing. This sequence might answer some questions, THE IMAGES GO BACK TO 2009!

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2458646/posts?page=144#144

I sent Cashill an e-mail yesterday.


113 posted on 04/08/2011 1:39:35 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: DrC

Is Barack Obama actually not in this photo of Barack Obama?
Salon ^ | 4/7/2001 | Alex Pareene

Posted on 04/07/2011 5:08:49 PM PDT by Kleon

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2701383/posts

RELATED THREAD WITH IMAGES - EXPLANATIONS - ARGUMENTS!


114 posted on 04/08/2011 1:52:57 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: DrC

You’re right. Look at the tiling of the wall on the right side of the Obama-less pic, as well as the warped and aliased bench.


115 posted on 04/08/2011 2:08:22 PM PDT by Mr. Blond
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson