Neither, however, is there anything in Soros' history that would indicate his willingness to do hundreds-of-millions of dollars worth of business with any man who would stand directly between him and his life's single-greatest ambition.
My writings here do not assert that this treachery is something Trump will do.
The article asserts that if there is the slightest scintilla of a chance that Trump might be persuaded to so behave, for as much as a $Billion or more, then there is no reason on God's green earth to vote for him.
There are simply much better choices out there who face no such temptation, and for whom executive governing won't be a "learn on the job" fiasco like it has been with O'Bunghole.
Too much at stake for any more risk-taking with our selection. Tested and proven is the only way to go.
;-\
Asinine. As the wealthiest candidate, Trump is the least likely to be perverted by money from Soros or anyone else. Your concerns are much better directed toward a Pawlenty, Barbour, or even Romney.