Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: FrogMom
Either that or he has never made the connection between those pretty plastic wrapped pieces of meat in the grocery to those grazing cows in the fields. If we were to substitute “the King's land” for “federal lands” would we stand for it?
13 posted on 04/16/2011 11:15:12 AM PDT by pepperdog (Why are Democrats Afraid of a Voter ID Law?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: pepperdog

You’ve said the most important thing so far on this thread, for our government should not own land.

Other than for military purposes, direct government ownership of large tracts of land should be illegal.

There is a solution to this: it is called Congress. Selling off real assets could eliminate the national debt and lifting many of the onerous regulations on landowners would go a long way to rectifying this situation.

Note the phrase, “Western Watersheds Project”. This is the one thing that gave me pause as it raised the specter of government control of water. The United Nations is Hell bent on asserting its control over the earth’s water through international treaties, and Obama, along with the Progressives, are aiding and abetting this activity.

Dammit! We should have sovereignty over our own resources, and no one else!


16 posted on 04/16/2011 11:46:49 AM PDT by SatinDoll (NO FOREIGN NATIONALS AS OUR PRESIDENT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson