Posted on 04/24/2011 8:22:20 PM PDT by impimp
A child was born in US after both parents commenced H1B VISA, but prior to receiving Green card, and prior to parents receiving citizenship. But citizenship and Green card are likely to be received within a few years.
I know its Easter,but seriously? All of the arguments are well-reasoned, but seriously, stop giving this troll fodder/ammunition.
An erroneous decision by a majority of the court with only a one vote majority, in contradicton to ealrier and later Supreme Court and District Court decisions, and a justice/s illegally appointed by Chester Arthur who was himself ineligible to serve as President.
Yes, unless the parents were diplomats or members of an occupying military force.
Baloney, hogwash and poppycock!
Don't start pushing that nonsense. The Constitution is clear. Nothing has yet been written to remove the natural born citizen qualification for president found in the Constitution. The founders did not want someone with any allegiance to a foreign country stepping in and becoming president, period.
If what you say is correct, why is it that every candidate that has this concern in their background wants to hide this fact? Plus, Chester A. Arthur, the only person other than Obama ever to become president with this problem, hid the fact and did all he could to keep people from discovering it. There is a reason for this and your erroneous belief does nothing to explain it.
Good enough to be a failed governor of Michigan.
Even with all his now evident faults, would Arnold not be an improvement on the incumbent?
I should have finished the statement:
Again, I say to be of the country, it is necessary to be born of a person who is a citizen for if he be born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.
To be natural born is to be born of 2 US citizens (plural) owing allegiance only to this country. Otherwise your allegiance is divided.
We have birthright citizenship (jus solis.) The 300,000 to 400,000 anchor babies born each year to illegal aliens are American citizens entitled to all of the rights and benefits every other citizen has, including voting. They can get an American passport by proving that they were born in the US. We have three methods of citizenship: (1)conveyance thru parents (jus sanguinis), (2) being born on US soil (jus solis), and (3) naturalization thru immigration.
They use both because they were grandfathering in the generation of people who predate the constitution and the founding of the country. There is nothing in the text of the constitution that says or implies anything about the parents of a candidate...
they were not immigrants...no Green Card...no residency...no resgistration as Aliens...
They were equal to tourists...but with a longer visa and they could work...
They were not under the jurisdiction of the US government...
the child has no standing or right to US citizenship...
That is all correct. The whole fiasco of willy-nilly handing out US citizenship to anchor babies and visa visitors and such, is all part of the communist push to undermine the USA, since about 1956 and Ted Kennedy's immigration push.
It is possible for someone to hold a US passport and another country's. That person could be born in the US of two US citizen parents who were born here. For Example, Ireland will issue an Irish passport to someone who can claim that their grandparents came from Ireland. It would be interesting to see if that person could run for President.
At the time the Founding Fathers were debating the issue of POTUSA, one consideration uppermost in their minds was that POTUSA must not have any allegience to any foreign nation. This consideration is well documented and the final nail was when Jay recommended to Washington that qualifying restraints should be added to make sure that there was no person with any suspect allegience to any other nation would be POTUSA. This is also documented. Jay’s concern was explicitly addressed by requiring a’natural born’ citizen as distiguished from a citizen. It was understood then without doubt that any birth tainted with any allegience to any other nation but the USA should not qualify for POTUSA. McCain’s situation would be a fence sitter. If one goes by saying the Founders intended both ‘jus sanguinis’ and ‘jus soli’ must be honored as to parents and location then McCains eligibility is questionable. However ,if the facts of allegience of the parents and their location at any time, McCain becomes eligible for POTUSA. I don’t realize any such arguments in favor of Obama’s eligibility. I really don’t care for either McCain or Obama being POTUSA.
You are wrong. Even children who are born here to parents with tourist visas immediately acquire US citizenship under jus solis.
In addition to the 300,000 to 400,000 anchor babies born each year in this country, there is an active birth tourism industry in the US. People come here to have their children in order to have the "insurance policy" of US citizenship. Birthright citizenship is the current law of the land.
LOL! Indeed.
According to the Wikipedia, the qualifications for El Presidente de México are somewhat more stringent than those for President of the United States:
Chapter III of the Constitution deals with the executive branch of government and sets forth the powers of the president, as well as the qualifications for the office. He is vested with the "supreme executive power of the Union."To be eligible to run for president, the following requirements must be met:
- Be a natural-born citizen of Mexico ("mexicano por nacimiento"), with at least one parent who is a natural-born citizen of Mexico.
- Be a resident of Mexico for at least two decades (20 years).
- Be 35 years or older at the time of the election.
- Be a resident of Mexico for the entire year prior to the election.
- Not be an official of any church or religious denomination.
- Not be in active military service during the six months prior to the election.
- Not be a secretary or under-secretary of state, attorney general, or governor of a State at least six months prior to the election.
- Not having been president already, even in a provisional capacity (see Succession below).
Mexicano por nacimiento ... hmmm. That means Mexican by birth. So, if Stanley Ann had been a little, loose señorita Mexicana, would that have made little Barry Mexican by birth, and, if she were herself Mexicano por nacimiento, would little Barry be eligible to be El Jefe?
They might acquire status as citizens but they do not acquire status as natural born cititizens. To use only jus soli as a sole criteria is neglecting the twin/ associated criteria of jus sanguinis and the basis of allegience. The point has been made as to why would the Founding Fathers who were learned men explicitly call out for ‘natural born’ citizen only in respect to POTUSA.
Obviously, the answer to that question is yes. Otherwise, if Ireland didn't like how a US election was shaping up, they could just enact a law making, for example, anyone who has served as Governor of Alaska eligible to be issued an Irish passport.
Of course the child can become POTUS. Look at how Obama is ineligible by the constitution and yet, he’s the President.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.