Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

You can get the PDF from the White House here. Now why would it have layers like this? Isn't that at least a little strange? Did someone forget to "merge layers," which would indicate that this is computer generated image? Or is this nothing?
1 posted on 04/27/2011 10:24:12 AM PDT by piytar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: piytar

Boxes #20 & #22. Notice how the last number 1 in the year 1961 is darker than the rest of the stamped date. Explainable or doctored?

63 posted on 04/27/2011 11:30:55 AM PDT by OB1kNOb (Our new state slogan: “Welcome to Arkansas. TAKE COVER !”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: piytar

Another issue, which may have been pointed out elsewhere: Obama’s number on the certificate is 10641. He was born on 8/4 and the certificate was accepted on 8/8 (which itself is another issue). The certificates of twin daughters born on 8/5 and not accepted until 8/11 were numbered 10637 and 10638. Same hospital, too.

I’m wondering what Corsi has to say about all this.


68 posted on 04/27/2011 11:40:15 AM PDT by 1L
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: piytar
I have not read all of this thread but here is my take. I opened the pdf in Illustrator CS5 and examined the layers. My thought is this: Most people think a pdf is a simple flat bitmapped document. But that is not so when you save one from Illustrator. Somebody slipped up and did not cover their tracks well.

I am a graphic artist and I often save pdfs from Illustrator. When you save as pdf, you get a dialogue box with options. One of the options is to “Preserve Illustrator editing capabilities”. I usually uncheck this option as that will make a larger file. If you are not careful, you can leave that checked on. I believe that is probably what happened here.

Why they messed with it in layers and what it looked like originally...I have no idea.

74 posted on 04/27/2011 11:48:56 AM PDT by Drawsing (The fool shows his annoyance at once. The prudent man overlooks an insult. (Proverbs 12:16))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: piytar

Here is a real certificate.

http://theconservativetreehouse.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/nordykebirthcertificate1.jpg

Notice the file number..the filing date Aug 11 1961 with File number 61 10637

The Obama filing date is BEFORE and so is the date of birth...The filing number is 61 10641 which is a later number.

Obama’s number should be lower or less than 61 10637..Not Larger!

See the problem?


89 posted on 04/27/2011 1:38:58 PM PDT by hadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: piytar

OCR might account for one extra layer, but it cannot account for the mismatch of the curve in the print (which matches Nordyke perfectly) vs. the lack of curve in the security paper pattern.

Here is obama’s new b/c with the layers removed. You can see how the printed lines bend down to appear that the paper is bent down, but a careful examination of the security paper pattern shows that the security-paper line-pattern is STRAIGHT! That can only happen on a photo-shopped forgery! No copier or camera could do that. That ONE item proves it’s a forgery. They’re BUSTED!
http://freedomtorch.com/images/obama-birth-certificate-long-form.png


103 posted on 04/28/2011 12:30:58 PM PDT by Captain Steve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson