Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Time to turn to the real issue, 'Does Obama qualify as ‘natural-born'?
4/27/11 | Joe Lynch

Posted on 04/27/2011 7:25:39 PM PDT by westcoastwillieg

Time to turn to the real issue, 'Does Obama qualify as ‘natural-born'?

The issue with Obama’s eligibility not only involves his place of birth but also whether he qualifies as a 'natural-born-citizen'.

After Obama played his 'Trump' card his supporters are trying to divert voters away from the 'natural-born' issue and obfuscate the definition of 'natural-born'.

It is generally believed the Founders considered 'natural-born' to mean born in country to parents who were citizens at the time of the person's birth.

As Holmes said to Watson, "The game is afoot." Attempts have already been made to use 'native-born' interchangeably with 'natural-born' and, as yet, there is no Supreme Court decision nor does the constitution define 'natural-born'.

While Obama has shown his birth certificate it proves that his father was not a citizen but the jury hasn't decided if he qualifies as 'natural-born'.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; certifigate; citizen; naturalborn; naturalborncitizen; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last

1 posted on 04/27/2011 7:25:46 PM PDT by westcoastwillieg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: westcoastwillieg

Yes.


2 posted on 04/27/2011 7:27:56 PM PDT by Wolfstar ("If you would win a man to your cause, first convince him that you are his friend." Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar
How does he qualify as a “Natural Born Citizen”? Native born - yes, Natural Born, no.
3 posted on 04/27/2011 7:32:06 PM PDT by frogjerk (I believe in unicorns, fairies and pro-life Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: westcoastwillieg

“nor does the constitution define ‘natural-born’”

It doesn’t define “and” either.


4 posted on 04/27/2011 7:32:48 PM PDT by Christian Engineer Mass (25ish Cambridge MA grad student. Many conservative Christians my age out there? __ Click my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: westcoastwillieg

Fox has talked about McCain & Arthur insofar as place of birth was concerned but never addressed citizenship of parents as a qualifier in itself. Further, Fox has failed to address (or even to pan or focus the camera on) father’s race which is listed as African, a nonrace. These “anomalies” are newsworthy. What are we all missing?


5 posted on 04/27/2011 7:33:12 PM PDT by Mach9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk
Since there is a huge “area of silence” surrounding this in the media you know this means it is terrified about it. I was watching CNN Tuesday nite and the attempts to obfuscate the issue were totally transparent and the fear was palpable. Obama's pollster was hysterical. Anderson Cooper perplexed and some other Leftist whore way over his head.
6 posted on 04/27/2011 7:37:44 PM PDT by arrogantsob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: westcoastwillieg
BO/BS could have answered that question in 2007 by releasing his long form birth certificate when he declared his candidacy. Instead he has spent more than two million dollars on a team of lawyers to prevent having to release any documentation and produced the phony birth certificate today.

The time for demanding that documentation has longed since passed. He needs to be removed from office and charged with treason!
7 posted on 04/27/2011 7:38:57 PM PDT by Defend Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: westcoastwillieg

Obama’s playing coy with his birth certificate wasted millions of Conservative-hours on a false trail, while all the while he is wide open for impeachment for his proven (from his own Web site and video) involvement in an illegal—and that assessment is from Minnesota law enforcement—Internet gambling operation, specifically the “Dinner with Barack” and “Backstage with Barack” lotteries. An AFSCME counsel said there is no way to run an interstate raffle legally and that it constitutes racketeering.

I have been saying this for years only to be blown off with wet-blanket remarks about “Who is going to enforce the law against the Chosen One?” If the court of public opinion had given this a tenth of the publicity it gave to the birther wild goose chase, Obama would have had to clean out his desk long ago.

When people listened to me in 2000 (specifically ONE columnist with national syndication), the anti-Second Amendment Million Mom March turned into a ruined heap of smoking rubble (figuratively speaking). How about listening to me now and helping take down the Disaster in Chief for a genuine reason that is a matter of proven record? All we need is one Republican member of Congress to put impeachment into motion.


8 posted on 04/27/2011 7:39:12 PM PDT by Winged Hussar (http://moveonpleasemoveon.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: westcoastwillieg
.....but the jury hasn't decided if he qualifies as 'natural-born'.

Juror number 9 votes he does not qualify as a natural born citizen and should be impeached.

9 posted on 04/27/2011 7:42:48 PM PDT by afnamvet (I stand with Israel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Defend Liberty

And by spending 2 million dollars, he wasted millions of hours of the time of opponents who were gulled into following a false trail. I have been saying this for years but nobody listened to me. A few thousand of hours from our side invested in the illegal lottery he ran to fund his campaign would have taken him down in 2008 and can take him down now. Involvement in a crime, and MN law enforcement said these promotions were illegal, is cause for impeachment.

I would not put it past Obama to create a deliberate air of ambiguity about his birth certificate to waste our side’s time and make us look like idiots when he finally put up the birth certificate. Ever hear the story of Br’er Rabbit and the Tar Baby? The more you hit it, the more stuck you get. The birthers now have tar all over them.


10 posted on 04/27/2011 7:43:20 PM PDT by Winged Hussar (http://moveonpleasemoveon.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: westcoastwillieg

The play has ended, the audience has exited the theater, and the cleaning crew is sweeping the aisles. The thespian who thinks there is any point in taking an encore now is probably too drunk to understand anyhow.


11 posted on 04/27/2011 7:43:20 PM PDT by tlb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar

Yes the jury (SCOTUS)has!!!

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2710016/posts


12 posted on 04/27/2011 7:44:49 PM PDT by Forrestfire (("To educate a man in mind and not in morals is to educate a menace to society." Theodore Roosevelt))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tlb

IF Obama is natural born, so is the son of SADDAM HUSSEIN, born of an American mother!


13 posted on 04/27/2011 7:49:42 PM PDT by outhousepatrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: westcoastwillieg
The House of Representatives definition for "natural born Citizen" was read into the Congressional Record after the Civil War, without contest!

every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen.” (Cong. Globe, 39th, 1st Sess., 1291 (1866))"

Parent's is PLURAL, not one BOTH.  Obama's father was NOT a US citizen, so no, Obama is NOT a natural born citizen.  Obama's father's allegience was to a foreign country.

Office Citizenship Age Residency (or years citizen)
Commander in Chief natural born Citizen 35 14 years resident
Senator Citizen 30 9 years a Citizen
Represantative Citizen 25 7 years a Citizen

14 posted on 04/27/2011 7:50:18 PM PDT by Netizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Winged Hussar
would not put it past Obama to create a deliberate air of ambiguity about his birth certificate to waste our side’s time and make us look like idiots when he finally put up the birth certificate. Ever hear the story of Br’er Rabbit and the Tar Baby? The more you hit it, the more stuck you get.The birthers now have tar all over them.

BO/BS made this veiled and desperate attempt today because it is hurting his ability to function. The more the issue of his phony BC is raised the more unambiguous the issue becomes. Add to the fact multiple Social Security numbers have been associated with his name and the fact one he has been using since 1977 was issued to an elderly man from Connecticut even though BO/BS lived in Hawaii at the time and never lived in Connecticut, then it becomes even more clear this is the biggest Constitutional crisis of our time because BO/BS is illegally occupying the Oval Office.
15 posted on 04/27/2011 7:55:51 PM PDT by Defend Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob
"Since there is a huge “area of silence” surrounding this in the media you know this means it is terrified about it. I was watching CNN Tuesday nite and the attempts to obfuscate the issue were totally transparent and the fear was palpable. Obama's pollster was hysterical. Anderson Cooper perplexed and some other Leftist whore way over his head. "

Keep up the scare!

16 posted on 04/27/2011 7:57:03 PM PDT by Godebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: westcoastwillieg

Yes ... it is time to answer that question. The bottom line is that without a Constitutional amendment, the Article II phrase "natural born" must legally be perceived and interpreted through the eyes of the Founders at the time it was penned. After fighting a long and bloody war for independence from Britain, the purpose of that Article II clause was to prevent the usurpation of this newly formed nation by a foreign power (especially, at the time, Britain). Who believes the Founders intended that children, born and raised by subjects of foreign nations who had not renounced their allegiance to the foreign power, who were not living at the time of the signing of the Constitution should have access to lead the most powerful office in the United States government? People who care more about Obama and their notion of "racial justice" (abbreviated as "racist") than they do about the Constitution and this nation founded upon it. That's who. Who does not believe this ... Patriots! And I am proudly one.


17 posted on 04/27/2011 7:59:24 PM PDT by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: westcoastwillieg

A good case can be made that the intent of the original framers was that “natural born citizen” described someone born on U.S. soil of U.S. parents. But, since no definitive ruling on this point has ever been made by the U.S. Supreme Court, predicting how the court would rule is a bit problematic.

Did the framers intend that prayer in public schools should be prohibited? Did the framers believe that their document would lead to the indictment on hate crime charges of those professing faithfulness to Christian scripture? Did they believe that the Commerce Clause would allow the Federal Government to regulate any activity that struck their fancy?

I will be so bold as to state that the courts will not touch this issue, and if they do, they will cling to the 14th Amendment to proclaim that Obama is eligible. And dont’ expect the politicians to step up to the plate on this issue, including all of the Republican politicians. They will all circle the wagons on any attack against one of their own, an elitist politician.


18 posted on 04/27/2011 8:06:58 PM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Netizen

Is it your contention that any person of mixed parentage is not a “natural born citizen” of any country? That hardly seems plausible.


19 posted on 04/27/2011 8:15:45 PM PDT by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Winged Hussar

First, that two million dollars he had spent was other people’s money. You would think that those people are wondering why he put them through this.

Second, if this is really a legitimate BC, then he had absolutely no reason to spend that kind of money. The fact that he did, gives credence to any who suspect this BC’s validity. He will of course, blame others, but again, he brought it on himself.

Third, his arrogance and obfiscation is also responsible for an honorable man’s court martial and incarceration.

Fourth, now he acts like it was our fault that we actually put him through this, when he clearly brought this on himself.

I have nothing but contempt for this man.


20 posted on 04/27/2011 8:17:51 PM PDT by chopperman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson