Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: GunRunner

If “natural born citizen” is synonomous with “natural born subject,” then no exception is needed for Thomas Paine.

All those who were citizens at the time the Constitution was adopted had parents who were not US citizens, nor were any of them born on US soil, because the US didn’t exist until then! It was created by adoption of the Constitution! So everyone was a naturalized citizen.

So again, you are refuted.


54 posted on 04/28/2011 12:18:40 AM PDT by sourcery (If true=false, then there would be no constraints on what is possible. Hence, the world exists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: sourcery
There's an exception needed for everybody prior to Martin Van Buren. No one is a natural born citizen in 1789.

No where did I state that a natural born subject of Britain automatically becomes a natural born citizen of the United States. The concept however, did carry over, as codified in Wong Kim Ark.

But men like Paine who were born in England and who didn't become a citizen of the colony until 1775 were eligible.

57 posted on 04/28/2011 12:39:11 AM PDT by GunRunner (10 Years of Freeping...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson