Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SoConPubbie

You’ve added nothing to the debate, man-up and defend your position


18 posted on 05/02/2011 11:17:17 PM PDT by blaquebyrd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: blaquebyrd

I am also a vet, WWII. I also believe in the loyalty oath to protect and defend this Nation and It’s Constitution. My brother who was killed on Okinawa and I discussed this a few time as we were children of immigrants. I don’t equate a service oath to just signing on for a public job which I have done a couple of times. I quit public service jobs after taking the loyalty oath which goes with job. When a public service job becomes such that you don’t feel/believe your effort does not produce or you are inhibited from producing results you believe should occur I’ve always said get out. In today’s government there are too many who know they aren’t doing the job and as for me they should get out. I’ll give Palin a pass on her choice.


26 posted on 05/02/2011 11:55:19 PM PDT by noinfringers2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: blaquebyrd

I am also a vet, WWII. I also believe in the loyalty oath to protect and defend this Nation and It’s Constitution. My brother who was killed on Okinawa and I discussed this a few time as we were children of immigrants. I don’t equate a service oath to just signing on for a public job which I have done a couple of times. I quit public service jobs after taking the loyalty oath which goes with job. When a public service job becomes such that you don’t feel/believe your effort does not produce or you are inhibited from producing results you believe should occur I’ve always said get out. In today’s government there are too many who know they aren’t doing the job and as for me they should get out. I’ll give Palin a pass on her choice.


27 posted on 05/02/2011 11:55:32 PM PDT by noinfringers2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: blaquebyrd

I’d would rather elect someone willing to relinquish power over a title-clinging politician (i.e. Blagovich, Sanford, Chavez) who refuses to surrender power under any circumstances short of being indicted or ousted in a military coup.

“Quitting” isn’t inherently bad, if done for the right reasons. In fact, let’s look at her history. Did you know Palin “quit” another six figure job, her oil & gas ethics commissioner job before she became governor? She resigned to protest corruption when the sitting Republican governor wouldn’t investigate the state party chair for sharing confidential state documents with an oil lobbyist. She quit because by law as a commissioner she couldn’t go public with her concerns because of confidentiality rules. So she quit to be able to blow the whistle on collusion knowing it would probably kill any chance she had to succeed in state politics as a Republican. And you know what happened to that state party chair? He was later given the largest ethics fine in Alaska history, largely because Palin had the courage to put pressure on the governor’s office and the Republican party. And what happened to Palin? She became Governor of Alaska.

Now let’s look at her situation as governor.

Palin was paid roughly 337,500 in 32 months as governor. After 19 bogus ethics charges against her, she owed around 500,000 in legal fees to her attorney. The current laws of Alaska required that every single filed ethics complaint to be investigated no matter how ridiculous (being photographed with a fish, wearing a jacket with a logo, receiving choclates and hockey sticks as bribes) and all at the personal cost of the defendant. Had she stayed in office another 16 months, she likely would have been forced into bankruptcy because Alaska law does not automatically cover the legal defense of its governors nor was the Attorney General of the state or someone else designated by the state to defend her like all other states. If you were working in a job that was costing you almost twice as much to go into work everyday than you were making would you stay there?

Even her set up of a legal defense fund like other politicians have was deemed unethical (It was arguably the strictest legal defense fund in history with all the restrictions it had for those who could donate) wherein a politically motivated investigator suggested Palin should just let Alaska taxpayers pay for her legal defense. They wanted Alaskans to take the bullet for the political malice of Palin’s enemies.. In less than a year, she racked up half-a-million (to put this in perspective, her salary as Governor was only 125,000 a year and she had even declined a 25,000 raise by the legislature) in legal charges with much more to come.

Has any politician at the state level attracted the volume of attacks directed at Palin? Is it normal for a governor to go personally bankrupt defending themselves against bogus ethics complaints? Palin incurred almost twice as much legal debt as the salary she drew as governor. Every day she spent in office she was one day closer to personal bankruptcy.

One can argue that she should have just fought her enemies instead of letting them win.

These frivolous lawsuits effectively paralyzed her administration wasting time and money; moreover, her office was bombarded with countless Freedom of Information Act requests.
The research and paperwork needed to address the lawsuits and FOIA requests, had an estimated cost of State time of 2 million and rising.

If you decide to continue fighting your enemies at the expense of the people you serve is that even ethical? If your presence in office is causing heavy collateral damage to your state, is it smart and ethical to remain in office no matter the cost?

By resigning, Palin effectively took the circus out of Alaska.

It is not a defect to relinquish power for the good of all. When politicians or members of the media criticize Governor Palin for resigning office, remember why she did so. Then ask yourselves, who are these people criticizing her for making that move? What would they have done if they were in her shoes, and why? This move on her part was what a good leader and a true public servant should do, given the circumstances. If only all of our elected leaders put the public good above their own ambition, perhaps this country would be better off.

Never entrust power to those unwilling to surrender it.


75 posted on 05/03/2011 7:12:20 AM PDT by Anamnesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: blaquebyrd

Your points only hold if and only if you can do all of the following:

1. Point to the specific line in the oath that requires her to stay in office no matter what.
2. Prove that the Alaska would have been better off with its state government as a circus where no actual work could be done
3. Prove that the Alaska Governor at that point in time had the same type of legal protections that the POTUS enjoys or something very similar


78 posted on 05/03/2011 7:35:55 AM PDT by Anamnesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: blaquebyrd

‘Blaquebyrd’, on Palin not fulfilling her oath by resigning:

In her resignation speech, Gov.Palin said:
“We are here today at a “changing of the guard.” Now, knowing how much I love this state – some still choose not to hear why I made the decision to chart a new course to advance the state. It should be obvious. It is because I love Alaska this much that I feel it is my duty to avoid the unproductive, typical “politics-as-usual” lame duck session in one’s last year in office. How does that benefit you? With this decision I will be able to fight even harder for you – for what is right and for the truth. And I have never felt that you need a title to do that. So, as we all move forward together, let us vow to keep championing Alaska and to advocate for responsible development and smaller government and freedom.(Palin’s Farewell, 2009, ¶31)

When I took the oath to serve you, I promised to steadfastly and doggedly guard the interests of this great state – like that grizzly guards her cubs, as a mother naturally guards her own. I will keep that vow wherever the road may lead.”(Palin’s Farewell, 2009, ¶32)

Sarah Palin resigned to get the countless attacks against her out of the governor’s office, and the money they cost the state, away from the burden of taxpayers.
Also Gov. Palin’s entire administration was paralyzed by those frivolous complaints.
In an article Gov. Palin said:
“I said, ‘Enough. Political adversaries and their political friends in the media will not destroy my State, my administration, nor my family. Enough.’ I knew if I didn’t play their game any longer, they could not win. I would not retreat, I would instead reload, and I would fight for what is right from a different plane.”

The Democrat operatives (and their Republican lackeys!!) responsible, were strangling the people’s business with their endless political manipulation of the system.
She resigned because of time and financial burden of a litany of ethics complaints in the past several months.
The complaints were without merit and took away from the job she wanted to do for Alaskans.
She had also fulfilled all the campaign promises she made, i.e., ethics reform, budget cutting, earmark cutting, getting the natural gas pipeline off high center through an open, transparent, and competitive process!!!
For the past two years Sarah Palin has worked tirelessly to fight Obama and his policies and elect conservatives.
She was responsible for the takeover of the House , twice as many Governships and lopsided GOP Statehouses.
Sarah Palin was #1 in the fight.
Given all the facts about what happened to Governor Palin during the last portion of her term, anybody with a working mind understands that what she did was for the benefit of her state.


84 posted on 05/03/2011 8:41:14 AM PDT by GlockLady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson