Replies

Any ill thought out public school by product liberal you know, would know this (NOT!):

The Bible definition of “hate” is to love less one than the other...

Example:
“As it is written, Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated. “ Romans 9:13, old testament passage Malachi 1:4
“If any [man] come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple.” Luke 14:26

So since the liberals love humanism over “nation under God”. They hate God as far as I’m concerned

The Bible says it, I believe it, that settles it.

Liberals hate the Constitution since they have demonstrated time and time again, in their minds, it is no longer relevant to their “progressive agenda” mind you.

Example - Article posted in the Washington Times in Aug. 2010:

The Liberal interpretation of the Constitution revealed

In a town hall on July 24, California Congressman Pete Stark gave us a revealing look into the mind of a liberal. He made the following statement regarding the Constitution, “I think that there are very few constitutional limits that would prevent the federal government from rules that could affect your private life.” While his honesty is admirable, this view is deeply unsettling to Americans who believe in the rule of law.

When liberals are asked about their interpretation of the Constitution, they generally are not as truthful as Congressman Stark. They tend to respond with ambiguous rhetoric about a “living Constitution.” The basic idea follows that the Constitution naturally adapts to changing conditions over time. This definition is their way of avoiding the fact that they do not believe in adhering to the Constitution as it is written or pursuing the correct steps for amending it.

The Liberal philosophy uses the “living Constitution” concept to legitimate any usurpation of power from the people. When liberals want to pass a piece of legislation that is not permitted under the Constitution, they spuriously use the General Welfare Clause as their justification. Using this method, they claim that healthcare, a living wage, and even owning a home are constitutional “rights.” This thoroughly distorts the original intent of the Founding Fathers.

Conclusion: Quite clearly liberals and “progressives” fundementally speaking, hate the Constitution and have re-interpreted it.

Liberals have demonstrated their disdane for the military, especially under the leadership of any Republican president... do you need me to give examples of that? Remember George W. Bush, Cindy Sheehan, etc...

Also, I don’t know your age, but I am sure you might have heard or remember the 1960’s and the vietnam war?

What leads persons to believe the collective good is better than the individual’s right is plain foolish... Precisely and namely because they are God-given rights...

I’ll give you an example of what I mean regarding individual’s God-given rights...

You see, Christians believe we are saved by confessing Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior, individually, not collectively. I cannot be saved, becuase my father is a Christian and vice versa. Individuality is freewill, freewill is a God-given right and big government, unequivocally is always inclined to ultimately remove these rights for the benefit of the state.