Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ransomnote

Since the containment is a pressure vessel, there’s no possibility of water getting out of the containment building through a trench anywhere. I can understand using the water as a radiation moderator to allow workers more time to work in the containment.


3 posted on 05/05/2011 10:06:51 PM PDT by meatloaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: meatloaf

Apparently the concern is seismic (if I understood what I just read here:
http://seekerblog.com/2011/05/01/nisa-instructs-tepco-to-study-demonstrate-dry-well-flooding-is-safe-from-seismic/

They’ve had a few days so perhaps NISA and TEPCO have decided that it is seismically safe? Seems like their seismic concern has to do with going forward - drywell filled with water and then large aftershock hits?
http://seekerblog.com/2011/05/01/nisa-instructs-tepco-to-study-demonstrate-dry-well-flooding-is-safe-from-seismic/


4 posted on 05/05/2011 10:12:59 PM PDT by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: meatloaf

Looking a little further, I was pleased to find
“-TEPCO has finally revealed some details about the actual construction of the temporary cooling system it will install.. at least at Unit No. 1. Here is a clip from the handout:”
Followed by a schematic that I don’t know how to embed but you can see it at the link:
http://atomicpowerreview.blogspot.com/

in case you are interested


5 posted on 05/05/2011 10:23:48 PM PDT by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson