Skip to comments.
Court: No right to resist illegal cop entry into home[Indiana]
nwitimes ^
| Thursday, May 12, 2011
| Dan Carden
Posted on 05/13/2011 6:35:22 AM PDT by jaydubya2
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 201-202 next last
To: jaydubya2
Anyone left still living in Indiana 6 months from now deserves whatever they get!
To: AppyPappy
Read the article, talking about the Judges sweeping decision.
102
posted on
05/13/2011 9:10:03 AM PDT
by
BCR #226
(02/07 SOT www.extremefirepower.com...The BS stops when the hammer drops.)
To: TxDas
View my tag line. I’m not exactly hard to find.
103
posted on
05/13/2011 9:11:13 AM PDT
by
BCR #226
(02/07 SOT www.extremefirepower.com...The BS stops when the hammer drops.)
To: muawiyah
Pretty hard to take any judge seriously who signs off on “unlawful” behavior by anyone.
To: Lazamataz
Well... Don’t. We’d miss you.
105
posted on
05/13/2011 9:27:13 AM PDT
by
Dead Corpse
(explosive bolts, ten thousand volts at a million miles an hour)
To: jaydubya2
"incompatible with modern Fourth Amendment jurisprudence"
I could give a crap about modern jurisprudence. The original intent of the Founders is fine with me. Its high time the citizenry gets the tar and feathers and actually treats these morons with robes the way they deserve to be dealt with.
Contempt of court? I have nothing but contempt for this court and these asshat judges. They're traitors, and the one who was a JAG lawyer is a disgrace to the uniform he once wore.
107
posted on
05/13/2011 10:22:13 AM PDT
by
Emperor Palpatine
(One of these days, Alice....one of these days.....POW!! Right in the kisser!!!!)
To: Tupelo
SWAT just haven’t run into the right guy yet. That fine gentleman is going to wipe out a SWAT team with explosives and Armor-piecing rounds as they are lining up to pop the door.
108
posted on
05/13/2011 10:30:17 AM PDT
by
ClayinVA
("Those who don't remember history are doomed to repeat it")
To: Tupelo
The marine made two mistakes.
1. Insufficent cover.
2. Not Shooting.
To: MrB; Da Coyote
"
"We believe ... a right to resist an unlawful police entry into a home is against public policy and is incompatible with modern Fourth Amendment jurisprudence," KEY WORD: "modern"
--------------------------------
Yup. That sticks out like a soar thumb.
" modern Fourth Amendment jurisprudence"...what they really mean to say is "progressive Fourth Amendment jurisprudence"
110
posted on
05/13/2011 11:08:12 AM PDT
by
rxsid
(HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
To: jaydubya2
I had a cop come into my apt. once totally by accident. He scared the heck out of me, I mean he didn’t have his gun out or anything, but I was really startled.
I wondered later what would have happened if I had weed out or something like that.
I guess in Indiana I’d be seriously arrested.
To: jocon307
Nope.
No warrant. You could have been flaying the skin off of your in-laws to make a coat and the evidence would have been thrown out of court.
There has to be exigency, which is probably why the Indiana liberal supremes decided to further blur the line here. The ruling is idiotic. I don’t know whether this can be challenged, but I believe it can be since the issue here is 4th Amendment.
112
posted on
05/13/2011 11:15:17 AM PDT
by
RinaseaofDs
(Does beheading qualify as 'breaking my back', in the Jeffersonian sense of the expression?)
To: rxsid
The German “Christians” in the 30’s did the same thing with their “higher criticism” of the Bible.
They substituted their own wisdom and “reason” for the written standard,
just as modern “progressives” (the same name as the Fascist supporters in the 30’s used) do today with the Constitution and the Bible.
113
posted on
05/13/2011 11:15:32 AM PDT
by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
To: RinaseaofDs
There are several amendments in on this one ~ not just the 4th.
To: jaydubya2
Can a cop enter your home in hot pursuit of a criminal?
Yes. Including if you are the crook.
115
posted on
05/13/2011 11:44:26 AM PDT
by
Mr Rogers
(Poor history is better than good fiction, and anything with lots of horses is better still)
To: jaydubya2
You might beat the rap but you won’t escape the ride.
Good luck on getting your computer, guns, food, etc
back too.
116
posted on
05/13/2011 12:12:37 PM PDT
by
cycjec
To: jaydubya2
David said a person arrested following an unlawful entry by police still can be released on bail and has plenty of opportunities to protest the illegal entry through the court system. Meaning you only have rights if you have money for a good lawyer.
117
posted on
05/13/2011 12:15:59 PM PDT
by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: Sans-Culotte
I don’t care how legitimate the actual circumstances of
the case were, this should never have been written by
any person graduating college, let alone law school.
118
posted on
05/13/2011 12:16:41 PM PDT
by
cycjec
To: blackdog
119
posted on
05/13/2011 12:17:55 PM PDT
by
cycjec
To: jaydubya2
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 201-202 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson