Skip to comments.
Court: No right to resist illegal cop entry into home[Indiana]
nwitimes ^
| Thursday, May 12, 2011
| Dan Carden
Posted on 05/13/2011 6:35:22 AM PDT by jaydubya2
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-202 next last
No Warrant,no problem...
1
posted on
05/13/2011 6:35:23 AM PDT
by
jaydubya2
To: jaydubya2
Wow...these rules would make the gestapo proud.
2
posted on
05/13/2011 6:37:30 AM PDT
by
for-q-clinton
(If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
To: jaydubya2
Welcome to the Police State.
The Fourth was dead, and it has just been buried.
3
posted on
05/13/2011 6:38:27 AM PDT
by
old3030
(I lost some time once. It's always in the last place you look.)
To: jaydubya2
I detect the putrid smell of liberal reasoning.
And which joke of a law school did this “judge” slither out from?
4
posted on
05/13/2011 6:38:33 AM PDT
by
Da Coyote
To: jaydubya2
I don’t care. Shoot the MFs.
5
posted on
05/13/2011 6:38:37 AM PDT
by
jimfree
(In 2012 Sarah Palin will have more quality executive experience than Barack Obama.)
To: jaydubya2
6
posted on
05/13/2011 6:38:42 AM PDT
by
Ratman83
To: for-q-clinton
I hate to say it, but if someone breaks into my home in a violent manner with (seeming) intent to do me harm, I am going to shoot first, ask questions later. Looks like I am screwed as I am a resident of the police state of Indiana...
7
posted on
05/13/2011 6:39:26 AM PDT
by
EnigmaticAnomaly
("Mantra of the left: 'It's only okay when WE do it.'")
To: jaydubya2
Just wait ‘till it’s a Mus-slime home that gets “invaded” and see what the lib-O-dung types rule.
8
posted on
05/13/2011 6:39:29 AM PDT
by
Da Coyote
To: jaydubya2
No Warrant,no problem...
No way Hosay...this is crazy.
To: jaydubya2
This is to end the financial damage awards for bad cop practces in municipalities. How can this be in America? The constitution describes quite clearly the rules for searches in the fourth amendment.
10
posted on
05/13/2011 6:40:41 AM PDT
by
blackdog
(The mystery of government is not how Washington works but how to make it stop)
To: jaydubya2
I do not think the case in question really represents the decision that was handed down. The cops were no doubt called by neighbors because the argument was getting out of hand. The couple were disturbing the peace if nothing else. The judge should have ruled that in that case, the police were not making an unlawful entry as they had probable cause due to the neighbors calling it in. Instead, they took the case as an opportunity to throw out unlawful search and seizure.
11
posted on
05/13/2011 6:41:12 AM PDT
by
Sans-Culotte
( Pray for Obama- Psalm 109:8)
To: jaydubya2
OK, Judge...
I’ll let the criminals know that all they have to do is yell “police” before they invade your home and attack your family,
and at that point, you have no right to “resist”.
12
posted on
05/13/2011 6:41:14 AM PDT
by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
To: jaydubya2
I’d like to say “Send this to SCOTUS!” but I don’t have faith they’d overturn it.
To: Da Coyote
"We believe ... a right to resist an unlawful police entry into a home is against public policy and is incompatible with modern Fourth Amendment jurisprudence," KEY WORD: "modern"
Indeed, your instincts are correct, this is "liberal reasoning", that those making decisions here and now always trump the reasoning and decisions of those in the past.
14
posted on
05/13/2011 6:43:00 AM PDT
by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
To: jaydubya2
"We also find that allowing resistance unnecessarily escalates the level of violence and therefore the risk of injuries to all parties involved without preventing the arrest."
How about you let the legislature worry about that and stick to the law.
15
posted on
05/13/2011 6:43:04 AM PDT
by
The Pack Knight
(Laugh, and the world laughs with you. Weep, and the world laughs at you.)
To: jaydubya2
Try that here and see how well that works for you...
16
posted on
05/13/2011 6:43:23 AM PDT
by
BCR #226
(02/07 SOT www.extremefirepower.com...The BS stops when the hammer drops.)
To: EnigmaticAnomaly
Obviously the court overreached ~ and now it is walking into federal territory. There are a vast number of USSC rulings to point to in case of any conflict arising out of a contrary claim by any Indiana police body.
I wouldn't worry about it.
Now, to the legislature ~ these people should be removed before they do some real harm that doesn't have a remedy elsewhere. They are obviously DERANGED.
17
posted on
05/13/2011 6:44:05 AM PDT
by
muawiyah
To: jaydubya2
Considering the fact that several home robbery outfits have dressed as Police Officers, and the propensity of Police Officers to be involved with criminality - this is a really really bad idea.
‘You can sort out illegal entry later in the Courts’ isn't applicable when they are there to rob you and/or kill you.
The 4th Amendment now means nothing Indiana - you have NO right to unreasonable search and seizure - and the Police can and will search you and your home with or without any reason.
Sick.
18
posted on
05/13/2011 6:44:10 AM PDT
by
allmendream
(Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
To: MrB
I heard crimminals are already doing just that in some areas.
19
posted on
05/13/2011 6:44:31 AM PDT
by
Ratman83
To: jaydubya2
This is such an injustice... I am somewhat speechless. So, police can enter your home any old time they want to, shoot your dog, kick your kids, smack your wife and you are suppose to just stand there? The first thing that came to mind is this: what a great way to do a home invasion. Buy some police badges online, smash through a door and do what you want because you know your victims will be afraid to fight back. Extremely disturbing.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-202 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson