It doesn’t matter how disputes are argued. The decision stands as is until argued again. Nor does it matter if there was or wasn’t illegal entry in this case, as the decision stands. Now, legally, you cannot defend your home against illegal entry by police officers. That is simply the fact of the matters.
Obviously you will win in the end.
If he doesn't mention this state court decision, and the prosecutor doesn't mention it, the decision will be made in conformance with OTHER decisions that might have bearing on the matters at hand.
You will notice that no officer was shot ~ so that right there is a fact that lends itself to the question ~ he just got pushed around (on a legal entry). If he were shot and killed (on an illegal entry) any darned fool can see that the facts are totally different and the decision issued by the court is not relevant to the case at law.
There are defense lawyers lining up to take this to federal court I am sure!