"The court's decision stems from a Vanderburgh County case in which police were called to investigate a husband and wife arguing outside their apartment.
When the couple went back inside their apartment, the husband told police they were not needed and blocked the doorway so they could not enter. When an officer entered anyway, the husband shoved the officer against a wall."
Looks like a more thorough reading of facts are in order.
It's still a bad decision ~ I'm kind of wondering if the change of a single word, namely "Unlawful" as in "Unlawful entry" to "Lawful", would make the decision match up better with the facts ~ and most of the rationale.
Is this a typo? Or are the judges on drugs?
I don't think there's any possibility of there being a different explanation.