That info was not in the source link.
Got more info?
All the information is available to everyone who is willing to punch links.
The NW article is kind of like propaganda. There's some truth in it; the Court went out of bounds (they didn't even need to prepare a decision here); and the decision has many more factoids than the news article.
None of us agree with the decision ~ it's too broad for the sort of case involved, and it's simply hypothetical. You don't expect that sort of nonsense out of a top end court.
On the other hand there was no unlawful entry ~ just a punk POd at his estanged wife and thinking he ought to push around the cops she'd called to her apartment!
There are limits ~ and all that happened is this punk got tazered. In the old days he'd have broken bones I am sure. Ain't modern science great stuff!