[bunster]

You need to fashion one about the 2000 Supreme Court decision on Gore v. Bush. Every lib I run into thinks the Supreme Ct declared Bush President where (I think — but if wrong, know I’ll be informed here soon) that the Supreme Ct ruled that Gore could not hand pick which counties to re-count instead of re-counting the entire state.

[kevkrom]

You need to fashion one about the 2000 Supreme Court decision on Gore v. Bush. Every lib I run into thinks the Supreme Ct declared Bush President where (I think — but if wrong, know I’ll be informed here soon) that the Supreme Ct ruled that Gore could not hand pick which counties to re-count instead of re-counting the entire state.

1) How many USSC judges concurred with the findings in Bush v. Gore? (7, of which, 5 concurred as to remedy)

2) What was the remedy granted in Bush v. Gore? (selective recounts not allowed, rules could not be changed after the election)

[KeepUSfree]

And, furthermore, some newspapers did the selective recounts - and Gore STILL lost - even under the most “liberal” rules in his favor....