——————So fairness doctrine was never enforced?-——————
It might be a good idea if you read/reviewed discussions ahead of time. I made specific comments regarding the difference in regulations:
==============(antirepublicrat said)—————Somehow, enforcement of the neutral state of the Internet is supposed to be a slope towards all of that government action that has already been taken?-—————
(My reply)Yep, because up until now they haven’t taken direct action initiatives; driven largely by marxists. That’s the difference.===============
And I stand by the observation of those differences. Any regulation of the internet has been minimal and hands off. Net neutrality represents something larger and harsher than the fairness doctrine ever could’ve been for talk radio.
The fairness doctrine only wanted “fairness”, similar to the equal time rule.
Look at all the players involved. Net neutrality might as well include the name “china” in it, because that’s where they’re going.
Net Chinality. That’s what this is. That’s what they want to do. They’re all marxists or progressive ideologues.
You watch media just like I do..... (?)
Have you seen any changes at NBC/MSNBC since comcast took over? Or is it still full steam ahead progressivism?