Very true. Yet, somehow, there's no way net neutrality can be the exception. Did I miss your response to my question of whether I should now love the DMCA and embrace unconstitutional copyright abuse because a couple of these organizations fight against them too?
I want to know what my position needs to be here. You have basically told me that these issues are now poison because of who promotes them, yet I'd like to be a conservative and fight against such things like unconstitutional copyright abuse and remove unconstitutional restrictions and chilling effects on freedom of speech.
All the evidence shows that the FCC only listens to groups with a similar agenda.
And when the agenda isn't similar, invent one in your conspiracy world where they are. Net neutrality is liberal, proponents are liberal and opponents are conservative! The FCC is full of liberal insiders! Wait, Comcast has an insider in the FCC and they're against net neutrality? Wait, that means they must be conservative, but I've already called them liberal. Oh, it must be a long-term conspiracy to gain the upper hand in the future when Internet access becomes a monopoly utility!
The facts clearly didn't agree with you. The Comcast involvement blew away your one-dimensional liberal/conservative view of the issue because Comcast was on two opposing sides, so you had to invent a grand conspiracy to make it align again.
I'm done with conspiracy theories. I stopped talking to Truthers long ago, and I'm stopping it on this issue too. Feel free to discuss net neutrality itself, but I'm not going to try to make sense of conspiracy theories anymore.
. I know what I’m doing around here is working. You are being surrounded. The facts speak for themselves.
Facts? Is that why I constantly find myself having to re-educate people about the fact that net neutrality is not fairness doctrine, or whatever else you've falsely equated it with this week? Feeding people a bunch of lies and corporate talking points, and having them believe you, is not something to be proud of.
It’s the merits.
The merits? Strange then that you spend almost all of your time talking conspiracy theory, who has what money and which organization is aligned what way, and what other issues they support. If you want to talk the merits, fine, but as I said above, I'm done with guilt by association and wacky conspiracy theory.
——————Very true. Yet, somehow, there’s no way net neutrality can be the exception.——————
As I’ve mentioned, I myself used to support net neutrality.
That was before I started asking the question “who are these people” and even “who is funding them”.
Just because you can’t ask those questions, I can’t help that. But no, net neutrality can’t be an exception. Not with this many marxists at the FCC. Not with this large of a marxist influence. Not with this much soros money.
It can’t be the exception. There’s just too much.