All that proves is that Black's law Dictionary is wrong. :) "Natural Born Citizen" is a term of art in the context of Article II, and it most certainly does NOT mean what you're Black's definition says, and that is easy to prove. Neither Indians nor Slaves gained any sort of citizenship by being "born within the jurisdiction of a national government."
Legal Jargon is fine, but when it conflicts with actual facts, it needs to be slapped down hard because it is misleading.
It appears, from the n00b poster’s posting history, that to mislead/knit chaos is the poster’s intent. When a poster slaps a fellow freeper with a clearly erroneous definition (Black’s definition cannot be the most accurate, for the reason you so clearly identified), you know you’re dealing with a dissembler.
“All that proves is that Black’s law Dictionary is wrong.All that proves is that Black’s law Dictionary is wrong.”
Let me guess: You did not say one word about Blacks having it wrong until you needed reasons why Barack Obama cannot be president. I can respect contrarians, but not people who start telling the rules different when then don’t like who is winning.
“Legal Jargon is fine, but when it conflicts with actual facts, it needs to be slapped down hard because it is misleading.”
That’s not what you did. None of the eligibility deniers spoke up when what was at stake was the principle.