Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

The depth of the quake must have some bearing on the absence of a tsunami. At a quake depth of 38 miles maybe the sea bed did not shift at all.


6 posted on 06/24/2011 12:04:09 PM PDT by JimRed (Excising a cancer before it kills us waters the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: JimRed
May have just been a lateral displacement....like is predominant along the San Andreas here in California.
8 posted on 06/24/2011 12:09:44 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: JimRed
The depth of the quake must have some bearing on the absence of a tsunami. At a quake depth of 38 miles maybe the sea bed did not shift at all.

That is a correct observation. The tsunami warning was sent as a precaution and once the depth was determined lent credence to it not being created in the first place.

20 posted on 06/25/2011 12:42:34 PM PDT by Godzilla (3-7-77)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson