Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Havoc Cry

The problem is that pit-bull terriers are actually a type of terrier, not a breed, per se. Just as there are greyhound types (not capitalized), and retriever types, and spitz types.

Even using “type” as opposed to “specific breed” - PBT loses, I’m afraid.

Of course, there’s also the problem that many morons can’t tell a Labrador from a PBT, anyway, much less any mutt. There are many more mutts out in the world than any lists would imply. So we can’t always count on the ID being correct. (Which is why I totally oppose “breed” legislation.)


52 posted on 06/26/2011 9:11:40 PM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Technological progress cannot be legislated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: the OlLine Rebel; Havoc Cry
It's true. My 100% purebred, registered Chocolate Lab was walking sweetly at heel on leash, and a guy asked me, "Is that Pit Bull mean?"

What Pit Bull? You mean this dog? Yeah, her name's Killer and that's why she's on this leash . . . !!!????!!!

Vets don't always ID breed mixes correctly, let alone Animal Control (notoriously inaccurate) or the newspaper reporter who probably never saw the dog, but thinks that "Pit Bull" sells papers. I'm totally opposed to breed legislation too, given the mouth breathing morons who would be "identifying" the breed.

60 posted on 06/27/2011 7:27:03 AM PDT by AnAmericanMother (Ministrix of ye Chasse, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson