Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: dfc1

One of the commentors on Tru TV said the same thing - she wants to testify. She had no evidence, of course, just an assumption. Makes sense to me!

Unfortunately, we are back to slides and biochemistry so the trial is lagging a bit. Poor jury.


58 posted on 06/27/2011 11:43:03 AM PDT by miss marmelstein (FR haters of Sarah Palin are wearing me out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: miss marmelstein
I'm popping my head in. Boy, this is some pretty dry stuff, isn't? Science was never my best subject. Still, it's quite obvious that the State is really on the ball.

Thank God we aren't having to listen to Dr. Robin Cotton and two weeks of DNA evidence, a la O.J. zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
(Well, at least to me. LOL)

59 posted on 06/27/2011 11:51:11 AM PDT by truthkeeper (Vote Against Barack Obama in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

To: miss marmelstein

I don’t know what else it could be except her wanting to testify. She’s probably hardheaded enough to think she knows best. She still might testify, but if she does, Ashton will tear her apart.


69 posted on 06/27/2011 1:57:38 PM PDT by dfc1 (I love Sarah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson