Ya gotta prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt to convict....the prosecutor obviously failed to do so. I think she probably did kill the child, but they have to be able to prove it.
” Ya gotta prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt to convict....the prosecutor obviously failed to do so. “
Not necessarily. This jury followed only what they could understand and identify with, given their low IQ of 2. They prefered the fruit salad Casey-defense that it’s always every one’s fault but Casey’s. This jury was entirely closed to the prosecution, and I believe predisposed to the low class popcorn soap opera of the Anthony family dysfunction over the science and the circumstantial evidence. The prosecution nailed all the elements but lacked video of the murder, the dumping of the body which this jury required. They presented it superbly, but it was over the head of jurors who don’t know “come here” from “sick ‘em “. (In my humble opinion.) :)