Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: truthkeeper

Gee, I listened to Mark Levin right after the verdict.

He is a lawyer, and pretty sharp minded conservative one, at that.

He said on the air, he did NOT believe the PROSECUTION proved the case, beyond a reasonable doubt.

He said they showed the mother was an awful, despicable human, and that the child was dead.

But he said they failed to prove the child was murdered, or that the mother was the murderer.

Apparently to Levin, the jury got it right, not wrong.


18 posted on 07/10/2011 6:58:08 PM PDT by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: truth_seeker
But he said they failed to prove the child was murdered, or that the mother was the murderer.

Yes, I know. First of all, I watched the trial. Unless I am mistaken, I believe Mark said he did not watch the trial but only read updates. I disagree with him.

If you recall, the jury also had an aggravated manslaughter choice. If they thought it was an accident, that verdict was an option.

Apparently the jury felt Caylee died of natural causes, because Casey walked free with no punishment whatever for "losing" her daughter, never bothering to report her missing at all and lying about where she was, and then having the child turn up dead.

Does the expression "getting away with murder" ring any bells here? BTW, seventy percent of the country disagrees with this verdict, according to polls:

http://www.christianpost.com/news/casey-anthony-polls-majority-of-public-disappointed-over-verdict-51908

19 posted on 07/10/2011 7:32:23 PM PDT by truthkeeper (Vote Against Barack Obama in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: truth_seeker

OK, I can buy the not proving Casey murdered Caylee, but to say it wasn’t a murder at all? WTF? 2 year olds don’t put themselves into garbage bags and throw themselves into shallow graves. It certainly WAS a murder. And Casey knows who did it. BTW, who is the father of Caylee? I saw a “fiancee” mentioned, but never a mention of the father of the toddler, who he is, what he does, where he is, etc.


24 posted on 07/10/2011 8:51:43 PM PDT by boop ("Let's just say they'll be satisfied with LESS"... Ming the Merciless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: truth_seeker

Was Levin a defense lawyer?


26 posted on 07/10/2011 9:27:37 PM PDT by An American In Dairyland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: truth_seeker

ALL the lawyers said that they didn’t prove their case.....I TOTALLY disagree.....Common sense should have trumped everything.


29 posted on 07/11/2011 3:33:00 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion is the Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: truth_seeker
Apparently to Levin, the jury got it right, not wrong.

He was completely correct. This is not the fault of the jury. This is the fault of the prosecution. They should have never gone for Murder 1 or Aggravated Murder. There was no evidence of premeditation and no evidence of aggravated assault - none. The cause of death was never determined. THAT is the kicker. If you don't know the cause of death, you can't call it murder. It really is that simple.

36 posted on 07/11/2011 9:18:53 AM PDT by numberonepal (Palin/Cain 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson