I don’t understand the liberal view of this.
We’re supposed to think that the legacy of slavery and discrimination has caused violence among people in the ghetto. And we’re supposed to think that lack of jobs causes ghetto dwellers to turn to crime because they have no food or money. We’re supposed to make excuses for all this wilding and violence.
I don’t understand the liberal thought process. Nor do I understand why, if we’re supposed to talk about the legacy of slavery and all that, why the MSM is reluctant to list the race or ethnicity of these criminals. If the liberal view is that they have an excuse because of slavery and ghetto life and all that, then why can’t the liberals in the MSM clearly identify the culprits, so we know what’s really going on?
Goodness gracious, based only on news reports, you would swear that Wally and Beaver and Eddie Haskel got into trouble over some teen age prank, for all we know about the “teenagers” who are perpetrating the incidents in question.
“If the liberal view is that they have an excuse because of slavery and ghetto life and all that, then why can’t the liberals in the MSM clearly identify the culprits, so we know what’s really going on?”
#####
A large part of the liberal mindset is a condescending, elitist snobbery:
If only those knuckle-dragging, Christian, racist whites out in flyover land were as open-minded, progressive and understanding as the magnificent “I” am, the poor minorities would not have the problems that they do.
Their pathological rationalization is that they are gallantly saving the downtrodden persons of color from hate-filled Archie Bunkers.
|